7.01 The Belly Cave Podcast & Urban Exploration

Guest Jims Urbex, host of the Belly Cave Podcast, joins Jack to discuss everything from urban exploration to psychedelic drugs and the covid aftermath. A must listen episode breaking down the intricacies of Urban Exploration and some of the stories and dangerous sites. This eye opening episode is a gateway drug to venturing out into your own surroundings and finding the secrets hidden in plain sight. 

+Episode Details

Topics Discussed:

  • Dreams
  • Psychedelic Drugs
  • Hospitals During Covid
  • Cave Clan = Fight Club
  • Abandoned Mines
  • Apostles are scientists - All cults
  • UFOs
  • The Queen’s Wealth
  • Homeless people with Cellphones
  • First World Problems
  • Life without Tech
  • Lockdowns and Panic

Jims Links:

Jims Website - Jimsurbex.com

Instagram - @Jims_Urbex

Show's Website - thebellycavepodcast.com

Our Links:

Official Website - https://greythoughts.info/podcast

Twitter - https://twitter.com/JustConvoPod

Facebook - https://facebook.com/justconvopod

Instagram - https://instagram.com/justconvopod

Rambling 141: What is Art?

art-movements.jpg

Does all art have meaning? Does creation have to be intentional to be considered art? The duo unpacks art, the meaning behind it, the evolution of art, artistry and what it takes to be an artist on this episode of Rambling.

+Episode Details

Topics Discussed

  • Evolution of Radio
  • Comedy Bang Bang
  • Earwolf
  • Meaning Behind Art
  • Accidental Art
  • Artist, Consumer, Product
  • Spotify
  • Everything is Art
  • The Jordan Harbinger Show
  • Music
  • Best Rapper
  • Alex Grey
  • Salvador Dali

Our Links:

Official Website - https://greythoughts.info/podcast

Twitter - https://twitter.com/JustConvoPod

Facebook - https://facebook.com/justconvopod

Instagram -https://instagram.com/justconvopod


+Transcript

Cristina: This program contains strong themes meant for a mature audience. Discretion is advised.

Jack: Going live in 5, 4.

Cristina: What does live mean?

Jack: Welcome to the Just Conversation podcast, the show where we ground humanity's most absurd and baffling ideas in childish ways. I am your host, Jack.

Cristina: And I am your host, Christina.

Jack: And if you haven't yet, remember to hit that subscribe button to get notified the second new episodes are released.

Cristina: Also, this show is most enjoyable with a listening partner to share opinions and ideas on topics we discuss.

Jack: Yeah. So go find people, tell them, hey, listen to this show. And you got to say with that radio voice. I did right there, hey, listen to the Just Conversation podcast live every Saturday at 8:00am At 8:00am yes. Usually when it goes up, I think, oh, okay. I'm 99% sure that it goes up at 8am okay. So that people have it on weekends.

Cristina: But they have to say, like, that.

Jack: They have to use their radio voice anytime they're referencing anything on the radio.

Cristina: But we're not on the radio.

Jack: You're right. Facts. This is Internet.

Cristina: This is Internet. Yes.

Jack: You're hearing our voice through the interwebs of the world.

Cristina: And the YouTube. I guess that's part of the Internet too.

Jack: But, like, all the things.

Cristina: All the things. Yeah, we're everywhere.

Jack: You can listen to us on wherever you listen to us.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: I mean, if you're already hearing this, then wherever you are is fine, but.

Cristina: You still have to talk in that voice. Are you just talking in that voice to introduce this?

Jack: Yeah, you gotta tell people about the show. Listen to the Just Conversation podcast.

Cristina: Do people still make that voice? I mean, on radio?

Jack: I don't know. Right?

Cristina: I don't know.

Jack: I feel like it's gotten more casual.

Cristina: It's become more podcasty.

Jack: Yes. There's a. Like, every f****** morning, there's a radio station. I hear that went from being a typical boring station to now just being 24. Seven podcasts.

Cristina: How do they do it? It's not the same people, is it?

Jack: No, it's just like, sport podcasts straight through a channel. It's like, whoa, that's kind of cool that they just, you know, a channel on the radio doing nothing but podcasting. No music. No nothing. Just podcast. No music, no music. Just podcasts.

Cristina: What, and that works for them?

Jack: I have no idea. I have no idea. How do you. How do we go about finding ratings for radio?

Cristina: I'm sure they're out there somewhere. There's gotta be. There's someone rating everything.

Jack: No, not people rating them. Like, how many people see a Thing.

Cristina: Oh, okay.

Jack: Like, are people tuning in simply because it's a podcast of sorts?

Cristina: Yes. Hasu.

Jack: I don't know, because that's true. Question.

Cristina: Are there a bunch of podcasts about sports because there's a lot of listeners or there's just a lot of people who enjoy talking about sports? Like, is there a lot of people that want to hear about sports or want to talk about sports? What's more, Both.

Jack: I don't. What's more, obviously people who want to hear about sports.

Cristina: It has to be, right?

Jack: Yeah. Like by default, way less people want to talk than there are people who want to talk.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Even people who love talking don't necessarily want to just talk sports. And even people who want to talk sports don't necessarily want to talk sports in front of a microphone.

Cristina: Yeah. And yet so many people do.

Jack: There's not a lot of people in that station. There might be like 12 people. Total 12 people throughout the course of the whole day.

Cristina: The whole day. Yeah.

Jack: Well, you're like, it's not a lot.

Cristina: Who wants to do that? I don't know.

Jack: They do.

Cristina: They do.

Jack: That's why they're doing it.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Otherwise they wouldn't be. They'd be like, f*** this job, I'm leaving. Yeah, but like, they like sports. They have to be familiar with sports. It's not a thing you can't. Can not like, and then participate in. You have to know what you're talking about.

Cristina: Mm I wonder if they need to make a channel then for other things. If they can do that with sports, they can definitely do that with just like those ladies that do criminal.

Jack: Oh my God. You're talking about something kind of amazing. Like what if you turned on your radio and instead of hearing s***** music on loops.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: There are stations dedicated to certain. It doesn't even have to be dedicated to certain things. Right. It could be like, you know, true crime is to some degree, it's true based on true crap. And it's dark. So this could be like the late night radio hour starting at like 8:00pm yeah.

Cristina: So it'll be like watching TV, but.

Jack: Yeah, but on the radio.

Cristina: Podcast.

Jack: And so the radio then plays it in disorder. So during a day they'll have more kid friendly things.

Cristina: Educational.

Jack: Educational, Yes. I guess not kid friendly because what kid is going to listen to podcasts but educational things and stuff. Funny things or funny things, but you know, not rated R. Yeah. And it's pretty much going to be education, like NPR stuff. A bunch of NPR stuff in the middle of the day and, like, shows that just talk about interesting things and talk to interesting people in relatively average ways.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: And then towards the late nights, you get the true crime podcast, the paranormal podcast, all these other kinds of fringy things. And maybe throughout the day, sprinkled, you get a couple of audio dramas. One here, one there. And so you got a little bit of everything going on.

Cristina: You need some audio dramas. What?

Jack: Yeah, that'd be pretty badass.

Cristina: Yeah. Let's start this channel.

Jack: You know who should, though? Scott Aukerman with all the Earwolf shows.

Cristina: We should do a radio.

Jack: Radio station that you just tune in and there's a schedule.

Cristina: Oh, yes.

Jack: Oh, yeah.

Cristina: That's a lot of stuff.

Jack: And then people fight for time slots all over again. Like, you could put it up whenever you want. That still works.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: But your wolf radio is also going to want it. So your show has to be of a certain quality at the same time that you can still put it up.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: And if it's. That if it meets the requirements, it could move to prime time. You want to get to prime time? When is the prime time for people to listen to podcasts? You want to be there.

Cristina: I feel like it. Wouldn't Comedy Bang Bang end up there. It would be his own show or.

Jack: No, it would be whatever makes him the most money.

Cristina: Ah, okay.

Jack: You know.

Cristina: Yes, yes.

Jack: Like, if it's prob. Out of all the things on Earwolf, Comedy Bang Bang is the powerhouse.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: But, like, how did this get made pretty up there?

Cristina: How did this. Oh, yes.

Jack: That's way listened to show.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: You know, so there's things.

Cristina: There are things, yes.

Jack: And Conan's shows on Earwolf, isn't it?

Cristina: I think so.

Jack: D***. That might be the moneymaker. That might be more than one that.

Cristina: I don't know if it's on that, though. The one that. What's his name? Will Ferrell. He does.

Jack: He's on Earwolf as well.

Cristina: I'm not sure, but if that is a Earwolf show. Whoa.

Jack: Interesting. Interesting.

Cristina: But I'm not sure if that is. Or if he's even still doing that. That might have been just a.

Jack: No, I think he's still doing it.

Cristina: Oh, really?

Jack: Yeah, I think he's still doing it. What the h*** is it called? The Ron Burgundy show.

Cristina: He must really love that character. I don't know if he does. I find him annoying, but people love that character.

Jack: Ron Burgundy.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Yeah. People f****** hate Ron Burgundy.

Cristina: Oh, people hate that.

Jack: Well, no, people love Ron Burgundy.

Cristina: They love to Hate him.

Jack: Because they hate Ron Burgundy. They're like, this is a despicable human. You know who Ron Burgundy would get along with?

Cristina: Who?

Jack: Bad Grandpa.

Cristina: What?

Jack: They're the same vein.

Cristina: Like, I don't know.

Jack: But, you know, I do love the Ronald Burgundy podcast.

Cristina: You do?

Jack: Yeah. I love this. I hate it, and I love it.

Cristina: So you're the exact people that listen.

Jack: The specific episode that's the best is when we couldn't tell whether Peter Dinklage was acting or not.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: And it's like, yes, they're acting. We have to look this up to find out he was acting. But, God, he's such a good actor.

Cristina: Yes. Because it sounded like he was really there to read some poetry.

Jack: Like, who the h*** doesn't want to hear poet, dude? I was angry because it's like, peter Dinklish is gonna read f****** poetry, dude.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Holy f***.

Cristina: Yeah. And I think the story was, like, it was his child's poetry or some weird story like that. I don't know, man.

Jack: So awesome. Peter Dinklage reading poetry. I was truly intrigued. I'm like, yeah, this is awesome. And then Ron just f****** it up.

Cristina: And it was so believable.

Jack: Yeah. It's because Will Ferrell is also a great actor.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: So Will Ferrell playing this troll. Committed to the troll.

Cristina: And Peter Dinklage being outraged.

Jack: So committedly.

Cristina: Yes. Very believable.

Jack: Yeah, man. That was pretty great. I dig it. Hated every second of it. Beloved every second of it. Because if it can make you feel anything, it's doing what it was meant to do.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: That's the point of all art, Right. To make you feel some s*** one way or another.

Cristina: But all art. I don't know. I don't know.

Jack: Fair enough. Not all art. No.

Cristina: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Something. It doesn't have to be the. Feel the same thing.

Jack: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: It comes into the idea of, like, abstract paintings, right?

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: Where you're looking for aesthetic. A color pattern that works in the painting or type of strokes that look a certain way. An effect. You're looking for an effect.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: Not necessarily something to provoke emotion, because I find it could, but that's 99% of the time. Just pretentious art douchebags who are pretending there's something in there.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: I love to talk to an artist who's like, yeah, my art had no f****** meaning. And then they tell me, like, but the f****** idiots selling it swear there was meaning, and the people buying it were dumber who ate it.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Yeah. But the Passion behind his strokes. And it was so you can see the anger in the thing.

Cristina: And it's like selling a story that's really good. It's not even about the art anymore. It's about the story.

Jack: Well, this is my point. People are eating that s*** up, but there's nothing f****** there.

Cristina: There is the story that guys is.

Jack: Selling, then you are not feeling the painting.

Cristina: Well, the story. You think the painting.

Jack: It's not about the painting. The painting had none of that.

Cristina: No. Well, the artist didn't, but the person who's seeing it now does have that.

Jack: Yeah, but it's not about the. It's what they were pitched on.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: It has nothing to do with the painting.

Cristina: No.

Jack: Somebody invented a narrative, and now somebody's following the narrative and they're associating it with the painting. But that did not come from the painting.

Cristina: That didn't. I know.

Jack: While the artist is like, well, this combination of red and white goes great with my kitchen. That's red and white.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: You know, and it's like just the strokes and whatever. There's. You know, my kitchen has stripes on the walls, and I wanted to make some nice vertical stripes that match the color schem. Assuming somebody else has a similar thing going on somewhere in their lives. And they see and they're like, oh, this goes perfectly. There's no emotion in the sense of, oh, I feel the anger. But there is a pleasant aesthetic feeling, like, when you just see something beautiful.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: That is what you're trying. So you're trying to get them to.

Cristina: Feel something, but just not a strong feeling.

Jack: It could be strong. You could be like, this is so beautiful. I've seen abstract art, and I'm like, what the f***? This is amazing.

Cristina: How did they do it? Yeah, usually.

Jack: But I'm also not like, oh, I can see the sadness in the. Like, who the f***, dude, Come on.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: You know, it's like you're getting them to feel something different. There's the boring basic emotions. Oh, make you sad, make you happy, make you angry.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Make you depressed. Whatever. You know, make you feel love or whatever. But then there's the more obscure, abstract emotions, like just beautiful without emotion other than beautiful. Not happy, beautiful. It could be dark and beautiful. It could be sad and beautiful, could be gloomy and beautiful. But the beauty is what you're looting to. It's just like, wow, this is really impressive. Or how elegant the way the brush moves or whatever.

Cristina: Some abstract feeling for abstract feelings versus.

Jack: Just the normal boring feelings that everybody gets.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: That if you can do that, that's the purpose of art, I think. I think it's also crazy subjective, but that's what I believe the true point of art is you're gonna feel something if you feel nothing. But also, I think it would be impossible to feel nothing.

Cristina: I think it's impossible. There's no way. You have to feel something.

Jack: Even if it's like.

Cristina: Even if it's positive or negative. Yeah. Like, if it's like, I don't like it or I do like it, that's something.

Jack: But if you could manage to be neutral, that's garbage.

Cristina: There's no way you could be neutral about it. I don't think that's possible. I don't think you could be neutral about any art.

Jack: You don't think that. You look at it and you're like.

Cristina: Okay, no, I don't know if that's possible. That's so weird.

Jack: You neither feel good nor bad about it. It's just like, okay, it's a thing.

Cristina: No way. But I guess there has to be. Maybe for photography, I don't know.

Jack: No, everything has to have. Everything has to. Have you seen a photo that you're like, no, that's a photo.

Cristina: Yes, that's a photo. I guess.

Jack: But then you see a photo, you're like, how the f*** did he catch that?

Cristina: Yeah, but that's. I guess, a person who's not trying to do something and someone who is.

Jack: Sometimes great things happen by accident. Making assumptions here.

Cristina: Yeah. Yes, I am.

Jack: Sometimes great things happen by accident. That's perfectly fine. You're skilled when you could do it intentionally. Yeah, but awesome things happen by accident.

Cristina: But in our accident, everywhere.

Jack: Everywhere, there are no exceptions to the rule. There are just as many talented people as. There are skilled people as. There is random look.

Cristina: Okay, yeah, there is random look.

Jack: Sometimes you're just f****** around and something happened, and now that's gonna be your thing because now you're obsessed with figuring out how to do it. Yes, but it happened by accident like that.

Cristina: The painter you interviewed, it was by accident, and now it's her thing.

Jack: Yes, Renee. Renee, Renee.

Cristina: Yes. She found her thing by accident.

Jack: By accident. She just threw the paint on a canvas and then came back the next day and saw what looked like a face and then started picking at it. By accident. Was that there? She's had a moment of frustration, and that is exactly what happened. Sometimes by accident. And then you're like, whoa, wow, there's something here.

Cristina: Yeah, but to redo it, that's how that seems Harder to do once you.

Jack: Yeah. That's when you commit to it.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Because now you know where you're looking.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Before, you were just winging it. Now you know where you're looking.

Cristina: Yes. Yes. How did we get here? From the radio.

Jack: Because the radio is going to put podcasts on the radio. And then we're talking about Ron Burgundy, because Earwolf would be on the radio, and we were saying, is Ron Burgundy part of that? And then talking about that great episode in which it made us both angry.

Cristina: And happy, and that made us think of art.

Jack: Because art, that's art. That's like, all things.

Cristina: Okay. That's art.

Jack: That's art. It is a performance you're putting on.

Cristina: Yes. Everything's art.

Jack: Everything is art. Everything is art. For sure.

Cristina: Yeah. Is that what we're getting from everything? Is that why people love the Internet? It's just art.

Jack: The problem is when you consume more than you return, when you take more out of the world than you put into the world, you are a problem. You are a resource draining problem. That's why you become the product.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: Not the consumer.

Cristina: But don't you need some of that? I guess. I don't know.

Jack: Not really. You don't need a consumer. I mean, you don't need a product. Not a person as a product.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: But because so many people become just. They don't give anything.

Cristina: Mmm.

Jack: They become the product. So there's three kinds of people, Right. There's a person who makes a thing, there's a person who buys the thing, and there's a person who is the thing. Person who buys, person who makes the thing, we will call the artist.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: The person who buys the thing has supported the artist.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: The person who just watches the thing without buying the thing or without making the thing is the thing. That's that artist went outside, saw that guy doing nothing, made a painting about that person doing nothing as commentary for people doing nothing, and sold it to the guy who buys paintings.

Cristina: Okay. So the person buying the things is not a problem.

Jack: They're not as great as the other guy, but they're supporting he who puts back.

Cristina: Okay. Yes.

Jack: So you're either the one putting back or you're making it easier for somebody else to put back.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: But if you're just taking your. A resource problem.

Cristina: Yes. Like the people who steal off of music and.

Jack: Yes, exactly. If you're burning s***, you're stealing.

Cristina: Yeah. You're taking away someone else's.

Jack: Yes. They made that. People who watch like, UFC for free, they're a problem. They're a problem. Those fighters rely on the pay that the company gives them. The pay is based on how much money comes in from people buying all the locations from which they can watch. If you're sneakily taking it illegally for free, then that money never makes it to them. So they're missing some of the money that they're earning because you're stealing it. Yeah, they got you to watch, but they didn't get you to give them the money that you owe them. Now, that's theft. That is stealing somebody's art, somebody's creation. They put their bodies on the line so that you can have entertainment, something you won't do because you're f****** too scared to go and f****** get in a cage with somebody to go train because it's too time consuming and you're too scared, and you don't have the discipline. Meanwhile, you don't want to give him five bucks.

Cristina: That's crazy.

Jack: That's all he's charging. Five dollars. Give me five dollars a month, and I'll give you my body to watch.

Cristina: Yeah. What?

Jack: You can do it.

Cristina: Mm. That's a problem.

Jack: That's a problem.

Cristina: So that's a huge problem. You call them the product.

Jack: Those people are the product.

Cristina: Even though what makes them a product?

Jack: I guess, because they are who everyone else is going to base their things on. Usually the person who's creating is using that person to create. Okay, so in the case of an artist, you're painting the flaws of the world. You're painting your inner thoughts, the things that bother you, the things that trigger you.

Cristina: And they're probably part of that.

Jack: They're probably part of that. Those people who are the ones who are not serving the world in any good way, those are the people you're making the art about. Then you're selling that to the person who's paying for the art.

Cristina: Yeah, but the person buying is not a problem.

Jack: The person buying is not a problem. Look at it like this. Let's use the UFC thing as an example again.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Bunch of people steal.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: So what does Dana White, the person who owns ufc, do? He hires a team of tech people to figure out how to invent a system that can allow them to track the people.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: Who are stealing it. To ban them now. To ban them. Yeah. Now, these people are the creators, and they're getting paid by Dana, the consumer, to solve the problem of the third party, the problem.

Cristina: Okay, so the product is a problem.

Jack: At the same time, the product is. You're always solving for the product.

Cristina: Yes. Oh, okay.

Jack: Yeah. Somebody needs to consume.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: And somebody needs to create. If you don't fall into either one of those two places, you're what's being traded.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: In the case of YouTube, there are the people who pay for YouTube.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: There are the people who make YouTube.

Cristina: And there are people who see for.

Jack: Free, and there are people who watch it for free. So what was the workaround? Somebody got creative and decided, bomb those people with the ads.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Now you're solving. So you. The consumer is paying to not get the ads, and the creator is creating the content that you are not getting the ads for. The thing that got sold in the interaction was the person who is watching it for free. You watching the ads is making it possible for the person who is making the content to get paid from the ads and from direct money that the other guy is giving to the creator.

Cristina: Both the people are helping. Both the other types of people. Not the creator, but the.

Jack: No, the person watching for free had to be solved for.

Cristina: Oh, okay.

Jack: Which is where the ads came in.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Because you can get people to give direct money.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: But, like, if there are no ads, why would I give direct money?

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: So now you put ads in place, people will give direct money, and you're solving for the people who don't want to give direct money.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: I guess they became the product.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: So you're selling them.

Cristina: You're selling them. That sounds so horrible.

Jack: But it's the case. It's always the case.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: In order to solve the UFC problem, you're selling the people. Those people are now the product you are selling. I need you to take these people into account. They're the free one. So I'm paying you to solve that problem. You make money because. F*** those people.

Cristina: But which people are you talking about?

Jack: The people who are watching it for free. In every case, it's the same people.

Cristina: No, no, no. Who's the other person that you're paying?

Jack: The tech people. Oh, who are solving the issue.

Cristina: Yeah. Okay.

Jack: Yeah.

Cristina: Which they do for video games too, don't they? Like people who hack GTA or something like that.

Jack: Yes. Yes. You are the cheater. Now you. Somebody became a paid individual.

Cristina: Dude, you probably get in trouble for that.

Jack: Somebody became a paid individual to solve you.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: There's the people who pay. You don't got to worry about them. There's people who made it. You don't got to worry about them. The people who are trying to get things for free. Now, there is a third party involved to Solve for you.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: You are the problem. The other two people are doing their part, so that is definitely how it goes.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Always some sort of problem out there.

Cristina: Yeah. So when are you gonna start this radio station?

Jack: I don't know. That would be amazing. I would love for that radio station to be created to turn on the radio. And there's nothing but podcasts and you randomly discover new podcasts and you're like, oh, s***, what's the name of this show? I want to go find it on, like, Spotify or whatever.

Cristina: Yeah. I wonder why that's not a thing yet. What is radio doing?

Jack: Radio and television are so slow to catch on.

Cristina: They really are.

Jack: How the f*** is cable surviving still?

Cristina: Exactly. Who has cable still?

Jack: They've tried everything. They're surviving off of their streaming services.

Cristina: The cable.

Jack: Yeah, they still have the traditional cable for like the 10 people who still have it. Yeah, but like, they also offer stream services. Way more people will pay you directly then you having to pay certain people to be on their channel. And whatever comes back afterwards is what you get. Because that's how like a cable company works, right?

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: You get put on their thing. I'm assuming you give them money of some sort. You give them money at the beginning. I want to be on your thing. And then over the cost of what I give you, whatever extra is directed towards me, I get. Or I guess it doesn't have to be that way. Put me on your thing. So you put us on your cable.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: And then if we make. That's free content. Yeah, I see. So we make the content. We put it on your TV platform. So your 30 channel cable package. Yeah, you put our channel there. And from our channel we get whatever percentage of views is total.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: So if we got 3% and 3% of all the money you get minus your cut belongs to us. That makes sense, right?

Cristina: I think so. I don't know. I don't know how cable works.

Jack: Think of Spotify. How music plays.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: There's a billion trillion freaking songs on Spotify.

Cristina: Do they have advertisement on Spotify?

Jack: Yeah. Okay, but there's a billion trillion tracks on Spotify. And based on the total number of listens, whatever percentage of everything that is, you get that percent of the total money that comes in after Spotify takes its cut.

Cristina: Yeah. That's probably what cable does.

Jack: Yeah. So if Spotify makes a billion $100 million and they take 100 million as their cut, there's only a billion dollars left. But Eminem does 1% of all listens on The Internet on Spotify. Okay, so he gets, what, $10 million out of that?

Cristina: Okay, so it depends on, like, how well you did and everything. Okay, Right.

Jack: So he would. Because it's 1%. 1% equals 10 million. I'm assuming that's right. Boom, he has his cut. Because he was worth 1%.

Cristina: Yeah. You think he's worth 1%?

Jack: H*** no. H*** no. There's way too many.

Cristina: Too many.

Jack: Too much. The print. Like, if the percentage is such a small decimal, it'd be like three points down before you even have a digit.

Cristina: Yeah. There's probably no one at 1%.

Jack: There's nobody 1%.

Cristina: There's no way. There's too many artists.

Jack: That means out of all the artists in the world, you make up 1% of all the listens out of everything.

Cristina: No, that's crazy. No.

Jack: If you took every musician in the world that's on. I guess every musician that exists on Spotify, you broke them up into 99 groups that were evenly distributed. There'd be 7,000 people in that group. 7,000 people in that group. You know.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: And then there's just you alone as the 1% versus 7,000 times 99.

Cristina: That's crazy.

Jack: H*** no. There's no f****** way.

Cristina: I don't think so. But I.

Jack: He's like 00, 0, 001 and still s******* on everybody else.

Cristina: Yes, but how is cable surviving? So cable.

Jack: I'm thinking the same s***.

Cristina: And radio are dying, though I have.

Jack: No idea how radio does it. I'm assuming the same thing too, but really, I don't know.

Cristina: And soon, what else should be dead next? I think our phones. Phone companies. Let's get rid of them.

Jack: Phone companies are going to die. And the problem with phone companies are it's also outdated. Apps make up for everything. And you could buy WI fi things so that you don't even need to pay for your phone.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Texting is a thing of the past.

Cristina: Our technology is not keeping up.

Jack: No, technology is not keeping up with how. Well, some technology. Here's the problem. The older technology is struggling. These are old people struggling.

Cristina: Things that we depended on.

Jack: Yes. People are struggling to let go.

Cristina: Yeah. Let go, man. Get the next new thing.

Jack: Kind of sort of. Yeah.

Cristina: The nano chip or whatever it's called.

Jack: No, that's exaggerated. But like the apps.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: That's worth Zoom and Skype and WhatsApp and Gmail, Google chats and all these things. All of them defeat you needing to pay for text messaging.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: And if you can have something that carries wi Fi around. Then you've also defeated phone calls. You need needing data. No, because you can call through these apps.

Cristina: Okay, yeah, you can call and you.

Jack: Can text through these apps. You don't need to pay s*** on your phone company. Phone company should just get over it and just sell you Internet packages.

Cristina: Mm. That's it.

Jack: Just sell. Really convenient, beautifully priced, not crazy expensive Internet packages.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: That's it. Five dollars. You get three gigabytes of f******, like, great. Okay, that makes sense.

Cristina: Five dollars.

Jack: Everybody's doing everything on their phone. Not for a smartphone, for the service.

Cristina: Oh, yes. Yeah.

Jack: For the service that you'd put on a smartphone. And then, like, all you really need is the data. Or just say unlimited data. F*** it. Unlimited data. Do whatever.

Cristina: Yeah, unlimited data for five bucks. That sounds good.

Jack: You could be $10. It could be the price of, like, Netflix or some s***.

Cristina: $12.

Jack: That's the average, right? $12.

Cristina: The price is always hiring.

Jack: Not of Netflix specifically. Of all the services. If you were to put them, summarize together, like if you grab the average of all them, but some of them all. Yeah, it'd be like 12 bucks.

Cristina: Yeah. Mm.

Jack: So this Internet, unlimited Internet. 25. $12.

Cristina: $12, yeah.

Jack: Good. Now it's whose Internet is better? That becomes the argument. Now competition matters.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Our service is clear. You get signal most places. Boom. That's better. Now it matters.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: Does your signal drop when you're in subway stations? Who has towers in subway stations? Now it matters. Now your $12 is better spent. How many places you gonna put those? $12. Everybody's gonna flock to whoever's best. Better be sweet with competition.

Cristina: That's great.

Jack: Yeah. We got to put it in train stations. It needs to be in planes. It needs to be here. It needs to be over there. In the middle of a cornfield, in the middle of nowhere. In the deserts, we need your phone.

Cristina: To work everywhere in the middle of cornfield.

Jack: Everywhere. Okay, everywhere. Whoever has the most coverage.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Then again, companies could vary. Like, I don't want to put anything in the middle of cornfield. But then there's a company made by people who live in farmland.

Cristina: Yeah, but like, if you don't live in farmland, you don't need that cornfield.

Jack: Yeah, like, if you're never going to visit that s***, you don't need that thing. And maybe you could get add ons. Like, okay, city areas. Anywhere that's local towers. But for the further towers, you got pay a little extra. So anytime you're in a city, doesn't matter where in the world. You're in a city. Fine.

Cristina: Yes. But maybe better than ever or something.

Jack: Yeah. But let's say China, for example. Everything is f****** banned over there. It takes a little more work to put a tower in China.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: So then we need you to pay extra to use the tower. That took us more money to put over there. Fair. But if you like going to Korea, like, that s***'s easy. They'll be like, whatever, put a tower over here, we need it.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: They're probably the ones making the tower.

Cristina: Korea.

Jack: So, like, depending on circumstances, like, okay, we have towers in the desert, but took a lot of work. If you want to use those towers, you know, give us more money.

Cristina: Mm, that sounds good.

Jack: And people who live in the desert only pay for the desert towers. But if you want to go to the city, you know, you gotta pay.

Cristina: What?

Jack: I would like figuring out a way to do that.

Cristina: Well, if you don't travel, then it's no problem. You just pay that one price and that's fine.

Jack: Yeah, but that's interesting, actually, when you think about it, Right. Because we were over here talking about art, and then we're talking about, like, cell towers. Right. Technology is failing to adapt or whatever, but, like, that's an artist doing that.

Cristina: Doing what?

Jack: A person who designed the cell tower with practicality because it had to make sense. So the scientist decides, okay, this is what it got to look like. But then there's an architect, a designer.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: This has to go into society.

Cristina: He's the artist.

Jack: And both artists is a collaborative effort.

Cristina: Oh, okay.

Jack: They're just working with different kinds of art. Yeah, my art involves numbers. And I'm gonna make something beautiful, something complicated, something that didn't exist before. I'm gonna bring it into existence the same way, except we just call that math and science. But you sat down, you thought about something didn't exist. You brought it into reality. Put some notes down, and here's what my art looks like. Very abstract, numerical. And you're like, oh, wow. Complicated. Interesting. I like how you figured out this detail and that detail. But if this was a painting, you'd be like, oh, it's interesting how you made this part and that part over there. And it's a different kind of art, but it's so art. Everything is art.

Cristina: Yeah. So the science is art, the science is art.

Jack: And then. Well, think about it. The arts includes everything. Why is a Renaissance person including science?

Cristina: The Renaissance person.

Jack: Yeah. Renaissance people know how to play the instruments, and they can paint, they can draw, and they can sketch. But every single one of them was also an inventor. They were those gears turned the same.

Cristina: Okay, right.

Jack: The contraptions they made, the innovations that moved society forward at the speed of light.

Cristina: They had some science in them. Yeah.

Jack: It's not just art.

Cristina: Or. Or.

Jack: It is art.

Cristina: It is art.

Jack: It's literally just art. But everything is.

Cristina: Art is art.

Jack: Everything is art.

Cristina: Everything is art. Yeah.

Jack: My art is thoughts.

Cristina: Your specific art?

Jack: Yes. I love to work with a thought and make something complicated and show it to somebody and then be like, wow, that's a beautiful arts and philosophy. Thoughts, Words. There you go.

Cristina: Words or philosophy?

Jack: Both.

Cristina: Oh, okay.

Jack: Philosophy in words.

Cristina: Yes. Is your art.

Jack: Yes. I like to turn thought into words. Alan Watts is my f****** hero. He turns thoughts into words, but he's a poet above all things. Like, he's an artist and he shows you some beautiful. And you're like, wow, this is an amazing mental image.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: I put my art into your head, then you see it inside of you.

Cristina: His art is complicated.

Jack: His art is complicated.

Cristina: He is an artist for sure.

Jack: Yeah, yeah, yeah. He paints you a beautiful picture inside of your head using nothing but words.

Cristina: Yes. And some scientists could do that too.

Jack: Some scientists could do that too. That was all of Einstein's entire goal. It was to convey it in such a way that you can get it. Michio Kaku is a great communicator as well.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: He developed the art of communication. Keyword. The art of communication. That's why we say that about a lot of things.

Cristina: Art of communication. Yeah.

Jack: The art of firing a gun.

Cristina: Huh?

Jack: Ever. You could attach that word to literally anything. The art of.

Cristina: The art of cooking.

Jack: The art.

Cristina: Cooking. Yeah.

Jack: Because everything, even shooting a gun. Well, look, the way he holds a gun in a particular way, his arm consumes some of the recoil, sending a shutter that keeps stability. It's beautiful how he does that and how he came up with this technique when usually I have a slightly left tilt and my hand consumes less of that. And there's art there. There's something to break apart. There's something to admire. The art of golf.

Cristina: Wait, can sports be seen as art? Yes.

Jack: All of it.

Cristina: All of it. Everything. Okay.

Jack: The Art of Charm, a beautiful podcast that teaches people how to be more socially active. But the word, the phrases, they've come up with. The art of charm. Just talking is an art.

Cristina: Yes. Oh, I gotta listen to that. That's pretty good.

Jack: Well, now it's.

Cristina: Oh, they changed.

Jack: Yeah. Art of charm is still existing, but now. Jordan Harbinger, show is where we go. Because Jordan Harbinger was the life of the art of charm, and he went and started his own show. So by the way, for anybody listening to this, if you are into podcasts about self improvement and just thinking outside the box and general information that helps you in life and success and business and relationships, the Jordan Harbinger show.

Cristina: He'll help.

Jack: Yeah, he is a great guy. His content is amazing. He is very intelligent, very charismatic, Very great lesson. So go check that out.

Cristina: I thought he was the art of the charm. He left it and it's got replaced with someone else. Or someone else was with him that whole time. I don't know.

Jack: Somebody else was with him, but there's another guy there too. Yeah. So I don't know.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: There were three of them to start with.

Cristina: Whoa. Okay.

Jack: But yeah, you can go follow that. But anyways, point being that communication in itself is an art. How you approach somebody. Flirting is an art.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: The. And it's a difficult art. Like, arts are difficult, but some are more difficult than others. And like flirting. People don't get that.

Cristina: No, no, they don't. But communication is so difficult in itself.

Jack: Communication is one of the hardest arts.

Cristina: Yeah. I think you gotta at least be in some good level with that before you get to the flirting stage.

Jack: Yeah. Yeah. But it's so many different branches in something. And the art of communication. Right. Because flirting is one of them. But conveying like philosophic ideas or conveying science without notations, that's hard for scientists. They don't know how to communicate. They understand the numbers in their head. But a lot of scientists don't have the art of communication.

Cristina: No. What? No, but man, everything is art.

Jack: Everything is art. And the idea remains the same. Art should make you feel something.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: And there are many feelings that we take for granted. But understanding is a feeling.

Cristina: So then how can there be something that you don't feel anything for?

Jack: That's interesting. Right? There should be. Because neutral. Is neutrality. A feeling would be the question.

Cristina: Huh?

Jack: Do you feel neutral or are you neutral because you don't feel.

Cristina: That's complicated. Because everything would have to make you feel something no matter what.

Jack: Right. Because everything is art in.

Cristina: But like your phone. But you see all the time that it doesn't look like.

Jack: No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. I got an example. Right.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: So somebody's talking to you about science and you're just not interested. You're not pushing it away. You're not listening to it, but it's not registering Communication is still art and science is still art. But why aren't you connecting to it? That's neutrality. You felt nothing, so you can feel.

Cristina: But would you not be bored?

Jack: No. Because you're not bored. Bored would be being repelled by it.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: This sucks. You're feeling nothing. You're engaged, listening, and still not giving a f***.

Cristina: That's still something. There has to be something still there. I don't know. Because you're still engaged, so you at least find something entertaining, whether it's.

Jack: No. You could just be there listening and that's it.

Cristina: And feel nothing about it. I don't know.

Jack: I don't think you need to feel something about everything.

Cristina: You don't? I don't know. That's tough. That's tough.

Jack: Why?

Cristina: Because I feel like I feel something for everything.

Jack: But then you're using subjectivity rather than objectivity. There are people who literally feel nothing.

Cristina: Mmm.

Jack: I guess that wouldn't be possible.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: If everything made you feel something, you wouldn't possibly have people who feel nothing. That would be impossible. Because everything would make you feel something. Even, like, the concept of lack of emotion would be impossible if just one.

Cristina: Person felt a bunch of things.

Jack: No, no, no, no, no. If everything was gonna make you feel something no matter what.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: Then you should never have a person who feels nothing. That would be impossible. But the fact that there could be people who feel nothing.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Means that there are things to feel nothing about.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: Because even if. Well, I have zero motion. But art is gonna trigger motion no matter what. You have an unstoppable force and an unmoving object. Okay, that makes no sense.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: We know for a fact there are people who feel nothing.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: So then the question is. We're debating one thing.

Cristina: So there's gotta be art that makes you feel nothing.

Jack: Yeah. If the unmoving object is the person who feels nothing, then art is not the unstoppable force. One of them has to cave.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: And one of them is factual. The other one we're debating.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: Okay, so not all art can make you feel anything. Boom. Solid argument.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: Interesting. No.

Cristina: Yeah. Yeah.

Jack: But yeah. So the goal of art is ultimately to make you feel something.

Cristina: Are we art right now? Is this art?

Jack: This is podcasting as art. Again, we're talking. And I said, ideas and words are my art.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: I talk, I communicate, I paint a picture.

Cristina: But we're sending art into people's ears.

Jack: Yeah. Podcasting is an art form. Some suck, some are great.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: It really depends. People who listen to us, like absurdism. They like that we put a weird performance of sorts that is really detached and kind of gets crazy from occasion to occasion.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: But has logic and reason fueling it. Kind of like Rick and Morty to some degree. Like it's absurd and stupid.

Cristina: Yes. Like our Godzilla poop story.

Jack: Yeah. But it has underlying logic because all you're doing is using critical thinking and taking it to the next extreme with things that are totally irrational. You're just thinking rationally about irrational things.

Cristina: Okay. Yes.

Jack: That's all that's happening. But it is an art form. Not everybody can do it, and they would like to do it. And they hear us do it, and they're like, how interesting that he went there with the thing.

Cristina: Yes, it is interesting.

Jack: That is art.

Cristina: That is art. Okay. If you feel neutral about our art, let us know. Yeah.

Jack: I do believe my favorite style of art is music because it's really profound. And obviously, I think everybody's favorite style of art is music.

Cristina: You think everyone's favorite.

Jack: Everybody. There's nobody who like people who are actively making art or listening to music while doing it.

Cristina: That's true. Unless they don't listen to. I don't know who doesn't listen to music.

Jack: I'm sure there's somebody.

Cristina: Yes, there's somebody. But it's not. There's not many.

Jack: No, there's not many people. The vast majority of people listen to music. The vast majority.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: And, like, not everybody's out there looking at paintings. Not everybody's out there looking at graffiti or tattoos. Not everybody's out there. But I would say that visual mediums tend to be like. TV is a huge one.

Cristina: It is a huge one. Movies, for some reason.

Jack: Yeah, Movies, video games.

Cristina: Yeah. But when it comes to music, I.

Jack: Feel like more people are into music than they are into tv.

Cristina: But the things that they like about the music is different, like, from one person to another. What stands out to them?

Jack: Why wouldn't that apply to tv?

Cristina: Yes. I guess. I mean, like. Like, you can hear one song and it would be different.

Jack: Right. And you can watch one show and get different things.

Cristina: Get different things.

Jack: 100%. Let's take breaking Bad, for example. We watch it and we see a complicated story about a man who went from being a teacher to being a drug addict or drug dealer. My bad. The drug dealer. And somebody else sits down and they see complex camera work. Somebody else sits down and they just see, regardless of the acting, the writing behind this is amazing. Somebody else comes down, sits, and it's like, wow. The expressions these characters give. Like, this guy is acting as pretty solid. They're not even paying attention to what the f*** is being said. They're like, wow, the way he conveyed that is amazing. It's just different ways to look at the same thing.

Cristina: Okay. Those are some weird ways. But they have to be paying attention to the story, though.

Jack: I'm sure in every instance, everybody's paying attention to the story. But also, you notice and aren't aware. You notice when an amazing camera effect happens. You're like, wow, that was crazy looking.

Cristina: Mmm.

Jack: So you're also looking at the things they're looking at.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Because people are focusing on different points.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: Some people like the adrenaline of Breaking Bad. Some people like the story of Breaking Bad.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: Some people are there, like, boring episode, Boring episode, Boring episode. Every season finale. Wow. Crazy. Because the crazy cliffhangers and the s***.

Cristina: That happens happens with Walking Dead to.

Jack: Yeah.

Cristina: People like the drama. Some people get the. The drama is the boring part.

Jack: Exactly, Exactly. Some people are there for the action. Some people there for the story. Some people there for the camera work. Some people are there for the writing. Some people were there to see amazing scenery as well. The detail they put into that scene. That's crazy looking.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: It's. Art is for everybody and different for everybody. Simultaneous.

Cristina: It's different for everyone. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Jack: So I think definitely music is my favorite. And. I don't know, depends on the musician too, what I'm looking for in a song, because, like, I understand. I. I'm really good at compartmentalizing things, so I don't need everybody to do everything. Like, I know an Eminem track has toss away beats.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: But so does the Lil Wayne track, because one dude's just being a poet and the other one's all being a different kind of poet, I guess. But like wordplay. One is being technical with his writing, the other one's being very vivid with his writing. Both original, completely different ways. Double triple entendres with Eminem and complicated metaphors with Lil Wayne.

Cristina: And then what's Andre doing?

Jack: He's flowing over a song. So you need the beat for Andre because that's mad flow. But also, if you took the beat away from Andre, it would sound like there's a beat because of how he flows.

Cristina: So he doesn't really need a beat.

Jack: He doesn't really need a beat. He is the. The beat. His whole s*** is flow. There's nobody with more flow than Andre.

Cristina: Yeah, but when it comes to other styles of music, you wouldn't be looking for these type of things.

Jack: Well, it depends on the musician. For Jack White, not only does he have really intricate, amazing, well thought out beats that he's usually the one making, but his word plays up there. He has tricks with his vocal. Liz. Asian. Like, not just. I mean, no vocalization, because the singing is amazing too. But he's writing. What he's saying is so clever.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Same way with, like, Arctic Monkeys.

Cristina: That's way more clever. Yeah.

Jack: Alex Turner is being a poet the way Lil Wayne is just metaphor after metaphor after metaphor after metaphor. Unique ones, too. That phone by the Arctic Monkeys on the Tranquility Hotel and Casino album.

Cristina: Oh, Hotel. And that album is like, what?

Jack: Yeah, the album is freaking amazing.

Cristina: That's complicated in its own.

Jack: But then you look at somebody like Kendrick and all of the above is in there. Everything, Everything. Everybody's everything. The best of the best of the best of everything is in his work.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Now, he himself isn't like, the best at wordplay. Eminem is.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: And he himself isn't the best of metaphors. Lil Wayne is. He himself doesn't have the best flow. Andre does. But he has all his thoughts at 9 if everybody else has him at 10.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: And if Eminem has 10 on wordplay, his metaphors are, like, out of 7. But Kendrick still has his metaphors at 9. And if Lil Wayne has metaphors at 10 and his wordplay at 7, well, Andre still has his wordplay at 9. And so if Andre. Did I say Andre Trice. Kendrick. Well, whatever. Kendrick. In all of these instances, I was saying Kendrick. I don't know if I was saying Kendrick. But anyways, if Andre has his flow at 10 and his wordplay and his metaphor is at 7, well, Kendrick still has his flow.

Cristina: All of it at nine.

Jack: All of it at nine. He's like, collectively better.

Cristina: He's not your favorite.

Jack: No, my favorite B. Eminem wordplay is so genius because Kendrick as an artist is better. He. The amount of producers on one track to make it sync up with him. Like, you couldn't separate Kendrick from the beat because it would fall apart.

Cristina: So you think once he leaves the people he's working with, though, he could.

Jack: Just hire other people.

Cristina: Mmm. Yeah.

Jack: They probably constantly rotating. Yeah, I doubt that the same 12 producers are always the same 12 producers. Like, it's probably just different producers doing different tricks.

Cristina: Crazy amount of tricks. I mean, it's because there's a crazy amount of producers.

Jack: So, yeah, everybody's got a thing they do, and they all throw their little special Sauce into a Kendrick track.

Cristina: Yes. He's amazing.

Jack: Yeah, his old tracks are great. Everything is amazing in his work.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: But like, that's really high quality art. And we look at somebody like Alex Gray painting visionary paintings.

Cristina: Whoa.

Jack: Amazing.

Cristina: Complicated, complicated.

Jack: What do people get out of that? People look at that in different ways. Some people feel a spiritual connection to something greater looking at his art, because they see a visual of what they were trying to reason in their heads to begin with. He paints a human body and he paints the energy you feel when you do something like DMT or LSD going through your veins and that sort of cold, hot feeling that you get on the surface of your skin and all those little tiny little details that he's.

Cristina: Able to paint that.

Jack: Yeah, and he paints that vividly. And then you see and you're like, oh, wow. He. He caught it. He caught the thing.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: The thing I couldn't put into words in a million years. He got it different to what Alan Watts does. He's conveying a philosophic idea while Alex Gray painted a sensation you had that is crazy.

Cristina: A sensation you had. Yeah. What?

Jack: You trip and you see Earth as part of the universe and you as part of the Earth and a tree as part of you. And there's a little painting that's all of the above. It's a tree that grows into a person that's part of Earth and is the universe or something like that. Yeah, it's like just stuff he does. He brings out that thing you saw and didn't make sense in your head.

Cristina: Because he saw it. Dude.

Jack: Swapped right up to the gate.

Cristina: There's no way.

Jack: I'm telling you, Alan Watts, Alex Gray, and Albert Einstein all walked up to the gate.

Cristina: You think Albert Einstein?

Jack: No, definitely not. Okay, I know Alan Watts probably did.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: He saw some s*** he should not have seen and came back with it. And I don't know how, and so did Alex. I don't want the h*** Alex saw. But what he saw was crazy because he paints him crazy. Some of his paintings are really dark.

Cristina: They are.

Jack: Yeah. He has a lot of really, really dark art.

Cristina: Oh.

Jack: Not all of it, but some of them. All crazy dark.

Cristina: Like Silent Hill dark.

Jack: Yeah.

Cristina: What?

Jack: Yeah. Cuz it's the good and the bad of tripping.

Cristina: Oh, okay.

Jack: So if you've ever thought you were the devil or saw the devil, or your f****** body's melting or something that's there.

Cristina: My body's melting. That is a horrible, horrifying experience. What? Yeah.

Jack: Yeah.

Cristina: Whoa.

Jack: Alex Grey's Crazy like that. Art in general is very amazing. Like that.

Cristina: The guy. What is my calendar? What's his name? Salvador Dali.

Jack: Salvador Dali's amazing.

Cristina: His pictures are melting. I don't know what his paintings. They look like people melting sometimes.

Jack: His paintings are. Because he's surrealist artist. Right. So it's just a bunch of weird things. You're like, well, it's kind of like this, but it's not. And it's like, not really that either. And it's like, it'll be a woman who's building.

Cristina: I don't tell what it is, but it looks disturbing in some way.

Jack: No, not necessarily tell what it is because, I mean, I guess, sort of. But it doesn't necessarily have to be disturbing. Like, there's a woman who's a building.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: But she doesn't look like a building. But she does look like a building.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: It's like she's just a woman. She looks just like a woman. But also she looks just like a building. But she doesn't look like a woman who looks like a building or like a building who looks like a woman. It just depends on which perspective you're looking at at any given moment. That it's just a building or it's just a woman.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: That skill.

Cristina: That is. That's so crazy. I don't know how he did that.

Jack: I don't know how he does any of his stuff.

Cristina: Was he also doing. What did you say?

Jack: Oh, man, he. If he did drugs, he did something that was very, very different. Because what you see with Alex Gray is, like, acid type of s*** is like, dmt, like mushrooms, that kind of stuff. Psychedelics. If Salvador Dali took drugs to get where he got.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: He was doing some f***** drugs.

Cristina: Why?

Jack: Because it's a weird breakdown of things. It would have been like. It could have been heroin. It could have been heroin. It could have been.

Cristina: There's always, like, ants everywhere.

Jack: They could totally have been heroin. Could have been meth.

Cristina: Oh, my gosh. Yeah.

Jack: It could have been any of those f*** drugs.

Cristina: What? That's so. I mean, who knows?

Jack: Could have been alcohol.

Cristina: It could have been alcohol.

Jack: F***. Ton of alcohol. Where s*** becomes unstable and kind of looks sort of like everything else.

Cristina: Yeah. Mmm. That's an interesting one. If it was alcohol.

Jack: Yeah. There's a couple of factors that could have led to his stuff being the way it is.

Cristina: Yeah. Or he's just super normal. I don't know. But his things. I don't know. It's just. It looks so strange to see something and it could be two different things. Yeah, it's like Eminem rapping in his three different things.

Jack: Yeah, well, he's mad skilled, I guess. Yeah. The interesting, interesting. I like that comparison. The Salvador Dali's art is like an Eminem song.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: It's several things layered on top of each other, and you're gonna see one of them and miss the other until you realize the other is even there.

Cristina: Like there was. I think it was elephants, but they were actually geese. Depending on how you were looking at it. Yeah.

Jack: If you flip the painting upside down.

Cristina: Yeah. What?

Jack: That's genius.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: That's skill. I don't know how the h***. I have no idea how he worked these things in his head. Salvador Dali. You guys need to go look at some art from Salvador Dali. Google it. Look at some images. Google Alex Gray. Look at some images. Listen to songs by Kendrick Lamar, by Eminem, by Lil Wayne, by Andre 3000. Go look at some architecture. Go look at some science notations. Read general relativity. So you can.

Cristina: You want everyone to become Renaissance men.

Jack: Yeah. Read general relativity. Listen to Alan Watts lectures.

Cristina: Paint, paint.

Jack: Do a little of everything.

Cristina: Yeah. Do everything.

Jack: Yeah. Anyways, I guess that's what art is. And now you guys know. We've taught you guys what art is because you didn't know. You didn't know before. Now we've told you what art is. You thought art was a painting and nothing else. Well, no, you're walking on art. You're breathing art.

Cristina: You gotta now make some art.

Jack: Cuz even nature made art.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: Because anything you make is art.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: The question is, can art be made by accident? Yeah, it could. It could. Definitely. We had that at the beginning.

Cristina: Yes. Yeah.

Jack: It happened by accident. Art does not have to be intentional.

Cristina: Does that mean that we were. By accident?

Jack: Yes, everything. Everything. Anyways, if you guys want to hear more things of this nature. I'm not sure if we break down art, but we do talk about different kinds of art, like music.

Cristina: And we talk to artists.

Jack: We talk to artists. We literally talk to artists. Yes. We got Renee Schuller on the show. Musicians.

Cristina: Musicians. Yeah, that's what I was thinking.

Jack: Directors, whatever. Just look at the show. Go through our catalog of See things, and you can find all those things on the official website, greatthoughts.info or on Apple podcasts, Spotify, or anywhere you get your podcasts.

Cristina: And you can reach us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok @JustConvopod.

Jack: Yes. And remember to subscribe, rate and review the show.

Cristina: And let someone who might like this show know about it?

Jack: Yeah, word of mouth. Extremely overpowered. People get blown away when you talk to them about the show, and you're like, hey, there's a show and you might like the show, so go listen to the show.

Cristina: And then seven days later, you die from cancer. Yeah, I don't have.

Jack: I don't know how long. I mean, you know, like 10 years later. It doesn't matter. Something like that. You'd live long enough to regret listening, at least. And also, you can find me on the stereo app having conversations with people, random strangers. All the time.

Cristina: All the time.

Jack: All the time. I'm just talking to strangers. Jumping on. You should check it out. Just to listen to other people talk. There's podcasts that happen exclusively on that app.

Cristina: When they follow you, though, do old conversations show up on that app?

Jack: Yes, they're all saved.

Cristina: Oh, that's so awesome. Okay, go listen to that.

Jack: Yes, you can hear all the old conversations. It's a whole other thing of content.

Cristina: Wow.

Jack: Yes, you can go listen to all the old conversations I've had of which are very trolly. And you can. You'll get notified. Make sure to turn those notifications on or whatever YouTubers say.

Cristina: Whatever the.

Jack: And you'll know when I jump on, I'm talking to somebody. So. Yeah.

Cristina: Yes. Go follow him. And this has been the Just Conversation podcast. Take nothing personal, and thanks for listening. Bye.

Jack: So the lesson is that Dougie ing is a dance.

Cristina: It's just a dance.

Jack: But the Dougie. Because I heard somebody say, she showed me the Dougie. Actually, I think it was Eminem. She showed me the Dougie. Or some rapper. She showed me the Dougie.

Cristina: Maybe he really meant the dance.

Jack: I think the Dougie met her cooch. Her cooter.

Cristina: Her Cooter. Why would she name it that?

Jack: I don't think she named her Cooter. The Dougie. I think the Dougie is slang for cooter. I don't know how cooterlicious.

Cristina: No.

Jack: What do you mean, no?

Cristina: I don't think so. None of that makes sense.

Jack: The Dougie. She showed me the Dougie.

Cristina: She did not show him the Dougie.

Jack: Google it. She showed me the Dougie.

Cristina: No. Okay, I will, though.

Jack: Google. She showed me the Dougie. Showed you said she should.

Cristina: She should. She should.

Jack: She showed me the.

Cristina: Is that how you spelled it?

Jack: Yeah. Eminem Book of rhymes.

Cristina: Oh, okay. She showed me the doggy. Can I get a witness? I don't know. She danced in front of him. That's all I can think of. I don't think she showed him her v*****.

Jack: I talked to your mother. She told me she loved me. All she want to do is just hold me and hug me. Wants nobody but me. She showed me the Dougie. Can I get a witness, like notary public? Preach. She said, kick some fly s***. Fly s***. I said, I got wings on my a**. Told her my d***'s a cockpit.

Cristina: So she showed him a dance. That's all I got from that.

Jack: Nah, I think. I think they f*****. I think he f*****.

Cristina: Yeah, after.

Jack: No, I think he f***** your mom is what he's saying.

Cristina: Yeah, after she danced for him, he was like, okay. Like, she did a sexy dance.

Jack: All she want to do is hold me and hug me once. Nobody but me. She showed me the Dougie. I can get a wit. Can I get a witness, like notary public? Sure. I think. I think Dougie means cooter. She showed me the Dougie. Show me her v*****. Her v*****. And then we done.

Cristina: Nah, she danced for him and then they.

Jack: You guys heard it here. The hot take. Dougie means cooter, and Cooter means v*****.

Cristina: That's not a hot take.

Jack: That's a hot take.

Cristina: That's not a hot take.

Jack: What does hot take mean?

Cristina: I don't know.

Jack: Boom. That's hot take.

Cristina: It's not hot.

Jack: That's steaming. That's on fire. On fire. It's a hot.

Cristina: It's a dance. She danced for him and he was so impressed. They had sex?

Jack: No, she showed him her cooter and he showed her his cockpit. And they did the Do. They do. Dude.

Cristina: Good morning. The Just Conversation podcast is hosted by Christina Colazzo and Jack Thomas, produced by Lynn Taylor and published by Great Thoughts info, art by Zero Lupo and logo by Seth McAllister with social media managed by Amber Black.

JCP 5.06 Tales of Duality & Global Consciousness

Guest Shot.png

Guest Jesus Pagan returns to discuss everything from creativity, spirituality, theology, chaos theory and more.

+Episode Details

Topics Discussed:

  • Chaos Theory
  • Writing
  • Netflix Productions
  • Anime
  • Philosophy
  • Spiritualism
  • Creationism
  • Reality

Jesus Pagan Links: Instagram https://instagram.com/tales_of_duality

Our Links:

Official Website - https://greythoughts.info/podcast

Twitter - https://twitter.com/JustConvoPod

Facebook - https://facebook.com/justconvopod

Instagram - https://instagram.com/justconvopod

Rambling 120: The Life Checklist

new_scientist_final-editable_2-flat-2.jpg

How do we know when something is alive? What of things that meet all the same requirements but we consider not alive? Understanding and designing a new checklist to measure life on this episode.

 Story:
The duo unpacks what constitutes being alive in order to best explain to the listeners who or what to force to listen to the show. But on their journey to understand the concept of life they discover several interesting facts and create an entire checklist with different tiers of life to assist scientists in measuring the possibilities.

+Episode Details

Topics Discussed

  • Are all living things conscious?
  • Which things aren’t alive?
  • The problem of aging
  • Is fire alive?
  • Carbon based life
  • Is God Alive?
  • Is sperm alive?
  • Organic Matter
  • Cells
  • Alive vs Galvan

Our Links:

Official Website - https://greythoughts.info/podcast

Twitter - https://twitter.com/JustConvoPod

Facebook - https://facebook.com/justconvopod

Instagram - https://instagram.com/justconvopod


+Transcript

Cristina: This program contains strong themes meant for a mature audience. Discretion is advised.

Jack: Going live in 5, 4.

Cristina: What does live mean?

Jack: Welcome to the Just Conversation Podcast, the show where we ground humanity's most absurd and baffling ideas in childish ways. I'm your host, Jack.

Cristina: And I'm your host, Christina.

Jack: And if you haven't yet, remember to hit that subscribe button to get notified the second new episodes are released.

Cristina: Also, this show is most enjoyable with a listening partner to share opinions and ideas on topics we discuss.

Jack: Yes. So go find a person and an inanimate object and make them both listen.

Cristina: What?

Jack: You never know what's alive.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: You never know. We don't know what is life. You force anything to listen, make your walls listen, blast it as loud as possible. You don't know if your house is alive. There's no way to tell.

Cristina: There's no way to tell.

Jack: Like weird a** rubric we have for f****** life.

Cristina: I guess if it has a heart. It doesn't have a heart.

Jack: It doesn't need a heart to be alive.

Cristina: What? What?

Jack: Yeah, let's think about it. Let's think about it. Right? Let's think about it. What do we call in life? If you're conscious, are you alive?

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: Is that life? So conscious beings are by default alive?

Cristina: I think so.

Jack: How do we gauge consciousness? In order to say anything's alive, then.

Cristina: You have to say it. You have to announce, I am conscious.

Jack: So animals aren't conscious then?

Cristina: Ooh, they're definitely conscious. They say it in their own ways.

Jack: How?

Cristina: With whatever sound that they make.

Jack: That's not saying I'm conscious. Are plants conscious?

Cristina: No.

Jack: So animals? Yes. But plants know?

Cristina: Well, I think. Yes, but if it's just by the sound that they're making that. No.

Jack: Yeah, it doesn't even make sense. Do they have to make a sound in order to be conscious? What about things that make sounds but aren't animals?

Cristina: Like what?

Jack: I don't know. Like a plant that makes a sound or some s***.

Cristina: It's a plant that makes a sound.

Jack: I mean, there's probably a plant that makes a sound. That's interesting.

Cristina: I would say that has consciousness.

Jack: Then by default, all plants have consciousness.

Cristina: Okay, all plants have consciousness.

Jack: But then where do we draw the line? Where do we stop our cells? Conscious?

Cristina: Yes. I don't know how. Yes, they're conscious. Everything's conscious. Okay. Everything. Even the walls?

Jack: Yeah. It seems like everything is conscious, right?

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: Because if we just assume that consciousness is like a collection of matter, then everything is relatively, like different degrees of conscious, but all conscious, no matter what.

Cristina: How could you prove any of that?

Jack: How could you prove I'm conscious?

Cristina: Because you can say it and I believe you.

Jack: Right, but why does me saying it make it true?

Cristina: Hmm?

Jack: What can you do to prove my statement?

Cristina: Brain scans does that how to prove consciousness. Maybe there's somewhere in the brain that says, is the conscious spot like everything else. Like there's.

Jack: We have no idea. We have no idea. There's nothing. There's nothing.

Cristina: There's nothing.

Jack: Nothing. We don't have a guide or anything.

Cristina: Well, there's no test.

Jack: Nope.

Cristina: I don't know.

Jack: There's zero things tell us whether something conscious is alive. We don't even know what alive is. Regardless of consciousness, whether or not it's conscious. We can't tell something is alive. Like, if we. Because obviously we don't even know what consciousness is to say that that's alive. I don't know why that was where you went with that. But, like, we can't gauge any consciousness in anything. We're just assuming consciousness because we perceive thus, you know? I guess the same s*** applies of.

Cristina: The if something's alive that it's also conscious.

Jack: I guess a cell is alive according to our rubric.

Cristina: Oh, is it? What's the rubric?

Jack: Well, it needs to reproduce, it needs to grow, it needs to eat. It needs to respond to its environment. Like a cell fulfills all those things.

Cristina: Really?

Jack: Is it conscious? Huh?

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: I guess consciousness is not the point.

Cristina: No. Okay, what's the point?

Jack: That we don't know what the f*** is alive. You can't just say something is alive because it's conscious. That doesn't make sense. Okay, that means that God isn't alive, but it's conscious. Oh, giant hole in the logic. That means that any other version of you in any other dimension is. Is by extension dead.

Cristina: They're dead?

Jack: Yeah.

Cristina: Why?

Jack: Because you're not alive, like, biologically, but you're still conscious. You're just dead. But, like, it doesn't make any sense. Okay, you got to satisfy the rubric. That's the measurement of life. Allegedly.

Cristina: Okay, but God's not alive.

Jack: God doesn't satisfy the rubric. No, he doesn't like age. He doesn't like die. He doesn't like. So what the f***? He's conscious. But does he. That doesn't make any sense. But I don't even know why we're talking about consciousness. Because we needed some inanimate object.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: Because it might be alive.

Cristina: Yeah. Well, how do you prove an in object is alive?

Jack: I don't know. I guess it depends on the object itself. Right?

Cristina: Like. Like what?

Jack: Here's the problem. Here's the problem. Here's the problem. You can't just grab an inanimate object. It would have to be something that already seems to behave on its own.

Cristina: But it has to be. Okay, so this is an inanimate object that believes.

Jack: I guess it's complicated. Would you say fire is inanimate? Because I feel fire is very animated.

Cristina: Yes, it's an animated thing.

Jack: Interesting. Right? So an inanimate object might not be alive because it's inanimate, but an animated object that doesn't satisfy the rubric might be alive.

Cristina: Huh? But how do we prove that that inanimate object is not alive just because it's not?

Jack: If we. If we go by the assumption that all matter has some consciousness, and the more complicated something is, the more consciousness it has. Everything is conscious. It's just different levels that we can gauge to some degree.

Cristina: But we're talking about life, though, now.

Jack: Yes.

Cristina: And anything that moves is alive. Like fire. You call that as light?

Jack: I guess. Here's what's weird. Here's what's weird. Okay. Okay, let's. Let's take some steps back. Right.

Cristina: All right.

Jack: There are literally animals that don't. Just things that satisfy the living rubric that don't move.

Cristina: What animal doesn't move?

Jack: Barnacles are this sort of sea creature that does not move or respond to its environment at all. But it reproduces.

Cristina: But that's like a plant.

Jack: No, it's sort of like a sea plant.

Cristina: Like a sea plant?

Jack: Something like that.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Coral doesn't move either.

Cristina: Coral doesn't. Okay, so just all these things are in the water. Is there anything outside the water?

Jack: There's a germ. Staphylococcus.

Cristina: That doesn't move.

Jack: It doesn't move. It's weird. Other things have to eat it up and then they get sick. But it multiplies.

Cristina: But it multiplies.

Jack: Multiplies how?

Cristina: It's like. But it's not moving.

Jack: It's like. It's not a virus. It's a germ. It's a living thing. It's like a cell.

Cristina: It fits, but other germs move. This is the only one that's not moving.

Jack: Yes. It's really weird. It's very strange.

Cristina: But we can say that it's alive because it reproduces.

Jack: It reproduces, huh?

Cristina: That's the only way we know. Like. Yeah, that's a. That's the Thing that's not exactly.

Jack: Exactly. Okay, fair enough. Fair enough. So let's really think about this, right? There is a literal rubric for something requiring to be alive, right? So there is. There's a chart, and I think it's seven things. So we got. You need to consume nutrition, you need to breathe air, you need to poop, you need to grow, you need to reproduce, you need to age, you need to move. Just things like that, you know?

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Basic s***.

Cristina: But how important are all those things?

Jack: Well, here's where it gets really weird, because not all things fit the category like what we just mentioned. Three things that don't move that we still consider to be alive.

Cristina: Is there anything that doesn't age? That's alive? What?

Jack: Turtles don't age. There's never been a turtle to die of age. They always die because they either get killed by some circumstance, get starved, or are sick. There's no turtle to have known to die of age.

Cristina: Of age.

Jack: Of age. No turtle dies of age. Turtles are the known immortal animal. Yes.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: But they age. They age, but they don't grow old, if that makes sense. They get older, but they never become seniors.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: And that is just a weird thing about turtles.

Cristina: That is so weird.

Jack: But also, jellyfish don't age.

Cristina: How do they? What?

Jack: Yep.

Cristina: Like, they don't die the same thing, or is it just like.

Jack: No, they don't age. They don't age at all.

Cristina: They don't.

Jack: They do not age at all. Neither do lobsters.

Cristina: What? Neither do lobsters.

Jack: Neither do lobsters.

Cristina: But they have to. They have at least the age of, like, baby to adult.

Jack: Well, no, you're missing. You're missing. You're missing. They. I guess I got a word. It. They grow up.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: But they don't grow old.

Cristina: They don't grow old.

Jack: In every one of these instances. They grow up, but they don't grow old.

Cristina: Okay. But they do die. Except for the turtle.

Jack: Not available.

Cristina: Oh, all of them are the same.

Jack: Yeah. They don't die of age.

Cristina: Oh, okay.

Jack: Because they don't age.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: They don't grow old.

Cristina: Or the jellyfish, the turtle, and what was the lobster?

Jack: Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes. Interesting, right?

Cristina: Yes. And for all these different things, what was it? The different points of life or whatever.

Jack: Yeah, yeah, yeah. The rubric, the checkboxes.

Cristina: The checkbox. Is there an exception for each of those things?

Jack: Not necessarily an exception for all of them, but there's an exception for a lot of them. For example, last year on an episode you were talking about, we found A creature that doesn't require oxygen. Loriciferans, which are a type of. What the f*** are they called? The type of film, the loriciferins, which are a type of film that was discovered to not require oxygen but be related to the other film that are things that.

Cristina: That's a fish. I don't know. I feel like it was something water.

Jack: Related, but I don't know. Microscopic creature.

Cristina: Oh, it's okay.

Jack: And it's the cor. Not the cordyceps. What the h*** are they? The water bears are related to them.

Cristina: Oh, okay.

Jack: And so this is a type of.

Cristina: Water bear that tiny.

Jack: Yes.

Cristina: Oh, okay.

Jack: Except it doesn't need air.

Cristina: What?

Jack: And sticking to the fact that not everything fills out every. Nothing completes the checklist. Not all things complete the checklist. The water bears themselves, what do they.

Cristina: They need.

Jack: They don't need food.

Cristina: They don't need food, but they can eat food.

Jack: They can eat food, but they don't need food. They have starved somehow for up to 30 years without seeing a single response.

Cristina: Well, but. And, and they just live.

Jack: They just fine.

Cristina: They're just fine.

Jack: Just fine.

Cristina: Wow.

Jack: Starve them out for 30 years. F****** nothing.

Cristina: But you would. If you still say these things are.

Jack: Alive, you still call, yes, they are alive. They, in any case, they respond, they do all the other things and then you have to say like, f***. So it doesn't fill out this one, which is crucial.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: But then it does all the others. So if like something reproduces, is it alive? If something responds to its environment, is it alive? Because a plant responds to its environment. A plant breathes air, plant drinks water.

Cristina: Are there any, then that. Which of these don't have any? Example of something that doesn't have it.

Jack: Something that doesn't have it. That's a hard one.

Cristina: I don't know, because you said most of them, they're the turtle and whatever. Well, is there any that all of us have related? I mean, is there one thing that everyone has, no matter what, to be alive?

Jack: No, no, no, because. Okay, okay, okay. There would have to be things. But for a fact, if. If one of the things doesn't make. If any creature can fail making one part of the list, there must be situations in which they all happen. Things that we would consider to be alive. In the case of something like sperm, for example, we trace it back. We're like a fetus is alive. Well, a human is alive. A baby is alive. A baby in the womb is alive, which means a fetus is alive. And we keep tracing it and we're like, it's all alive. The ups of sperm before it's even a sperm, when it's just a collection of cells. But that's actually wrong because a sperm neither eats nor poops.

Cristina: So that's two of the things. Okay, so if they're missing more than two or two or more, then you wouldn't call them alive.

Jack: I don't know, it's complicated because some.

Cristina: Of these things were missing one thing, but you'd still say they're alive.

Jack: Yes. So the sperm is missing two and we still call the sperm alive.

Cristina: Yeah. Okay, so but should we. Or should two be the mark of like. Okay, now you're not alive.

Jack: I don't know. See, here's the thing. Here's the thing. I think our definition of life is.

Cristina: Flawed for like this checklist or.

Jack: Yeah, the checklist is f*****. The checklist is f*****. Because there's exceptions to the rule. Yeah, should be. The reason we can't find life is because we have a very strict thing and we're measuring everything by this loose, always changing thing. If we just pick some f****** things and say these things are alive, then we can basically. We need a word for something else. Now let's look at it like this, right? Carbon based life. One type of life. We theorize that there is the possibility for life not based on carbon.

Cristina: Yeah. There's like two other elements that you were talking about in some other episode. They were.

Jack: So there is the possibility that there could be creatures based on other elements that are sticky as well. We just don't have any proof for it. But we're also looking based on a rubric that's always changing. So we can't even find ourselves.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: So we need alive and we'll say that's carbon based life. If you're carbon based, you're alive. But let's use a different word that also means alive and say that some other s***. Is that anything that isn't carbon based but seems to have more or less the same things.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: We can say is Galvan.

Cristina: Galvan.

Jack: Galvan. Which also means essentially animated.

Cristina: Yes. That's when they electrify dead bodies. I think that's alive, but it's not.

Jack: Really alive exactly, it's galvanized.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: So alive in Galvan. So carbon based life that is alive.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: And then things that aren't carbon but fill out the rubric are then Galvan. And then we need a rubric for Galvan hard. There's no way to really do that yet. We just have to figure out what life is. Not before we can say what Galvan is. And that's where we're f****** up. Because we have a weird list that's always shifting.

Cristina: Yes, but do you have a list yourself for what life should be then?

Jack: Well, I think we should take out several things. Because nobody's gonna say a turtle isn't alive. Nobody's gonna say that a jellyfish isn't alive. Nobody's gonna say that a lobster isn't alive.

Cristina: No.

Jack: Aging is not a requirement of life. In fact, if we ever find the cure to aging and thus solve the problem of death. Death. We even know what. What things in our body specifically cause aging.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: We might solve that problem.

Cristina: We might still be alive even if we solve the problem of death.

Jack: Exactly. In which case we can already foresee a future in which aging isn't a thing. But that doesn't stop us from being alive.

Cristina: Oh, okay.

Jack: So we can remove aging from the equation.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: The other thing we can definitely remove from is movement.

Cristina: Yeah. That seems really wrong.

Jack: Movement is an issue.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Responding to your environment. Completely unnecessary. And there's one perfect example of that case.

Cristina: What's that?

Jack: You can have a brain dead individual.

Cristina: Okay. That's exactly what I was thinking. Like.

Jack: And they're still alive.

Cristina: They're still alive. That's why. That's why I was thinking. Like that's so wrong. Because that's exactly what I pictured.

Jack: Yeah. It doesn't make sense. It doesn't make any sense. There's still alive even if they're not moving.

Cristina: Yep.

Jack: They have no motion. But you've not said they're dead yet.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: And those two things are a problem. The other things that obviously don't need to make it are like consciousness. You can't judge that. You can't judge that. Exactly. There's no way to do it. Which would mean the only things that are a requirement for life would be nutrition. You have to consume things.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: Respiration, you have to inhale oxygen. Excretion, you have to have waste for what you consume. Growth. You need to grow in some degree even if you don't age. Two different things. And reproduction. You need to be able to make more of you.

Cristina: Awesome.

Jack: Now, something that is Galvan doesn't require any of the things I've just mentioned. But it does not at any moment mean that it's not conscious.

Cristina: Because we're not counting anything about conscious though. Because we can't tell.

Jack: Yes. We're saying that any conscious being could be alive. Or Galvan and Galvin is the thing that isn't life, but is not. But it's similar. It's the. It's life that isn't carbon.

Cristina: Okay?

Jack: That's Galvin.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: And because it's not carbon, it doesn't behave the way that things that are carbon are. But what do we mean? We mean is that it is conscious. It's perceiving the universe.

Cristina: There's no examples of Galvin.

Jack: Not that we can think of. Exactly. Yet.

Cristina: Yes, yet.

Jack: With enough time. But with this list, a couple of weird things will happen. Because most of the things in the world we can easily chalk off to alive and dead. Some of them are hypocritically so.

Cristina: Like what?

Jack: We just don't like some things?

Cristina: We just don't like some.

Jack: Yeah, we just don't like some things. And we done call it not alive because we can't.

Cristina: We.

Jack: We can't talk to it or something, you know. Yes, But a good example of something that fills the rubric out, all right, is fire.

Cristina: Fire.

Jack: Fire needs matter. Yes, yes, the checklist. Fire needs matter. Fire breathes air, Fire leaves waste. Fire grows and it reproduces fire. And the craziest part is it is carbon based.

Cristina: Yes. It fits all this and even fits some of the other things we took off the list, like movement.

Jack: Movement. Yep, yep, yep.

Cristina: What?

Jack: So fire is by any other measure alive. It's a living thing. It responds to its environment.

Cristina: Yeah. What?

Jack: It is a living thing. Fire is a living thing, alright.

Cristina: What?

Jack: Not only that, but fire. So unbelievably similar to humans in so many ways. Let's break down what a human is. Right. So human consists of a cycle of oxygen, carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, calcium and phosphorus, while fire consists of a cycle of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen. All this f****** missing is phosphorus and calcium.

Cristina: Wow.

Jack: Okay, so then we go on and say humans breathe oxygen. Well, so does fire.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Fire cannot exist without oxygen. It would disappear. It's composed of a combination, particularly the running forces. The big giant chunks of everything that creates a person is carbon and nitrogen. Those are the two big ones out of all the major elements that they're composed of. Well, so is fire. Humans, after they inhale oxygen, they exhale carbon dioxide, which just so happens to be what fire leaves behind after it takes in the air.

Cristina: We're twinning. Oh my gosh, we're twinning.

Jack: F*** yeah. And the obvious one, that humans respond to their environment as does fire. Now, interesting enough. Fire fuses to procreate like a very specific species of angler fish.

Cristina: What do you Mean like angler fish.

Jack: There's an. There's an angler fish that it fuses with the female to reproduce. Their bodies fuse and fire.

Cristina: That's what's happening with fire.

Jack: Fire can fuse to reproduce. Fire doesn't need that to reproduce, but it can do that to reproduce, which is something that we already see in nature by something we already call alive. So it reproduces like something fully biological.

Cristina: What?

Jack: The only difference between fire and humans is that fire isn't, isn't composed of cells. That's an interesting thing that's going on there.

Cristina: We do we. Is that part of the definition? That's not part of the definition.

Jack: No, that's not part of the definition of life.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: It is not made of cells, although I think people think of it that way. I think that's the general consensus. We're just looking for things that are either cells or made of cells and calling that alive and then trying to nail down the checklist for anything and everything that contains cells. But the problem is not everything falls in.

Cristina: Yes, like this. Like fire.

Jack: Yes, but in this case, by choosing very specific things, we can call something alive without needing the requirement of it being composed of cells. Although it's still carbon based life.

Cristina: It is what? It's a whole different type of life.

Jack: It's a whole different type of life and we can compare it and it makes perfect sense. It is carbon based life that behaves in every, every possible way like a human. It's just not made of cells. The problem is, in science we have a very particular problem where we think we already figured it out and moved forward as such. So cells that's alive. Now anything that has cells is alive by default.

Cristina: But.

Jack: Okay, then make a rule set that tells us. Well, no, if their argument was it's made of cells, thus alive. Fine, but why do we have a checklist then? The checklist would just be it's made out of cells.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Thus alive.

Cristina: The end. But then what about plants? No, they have cells too, right? Yeah, it's just different.

Jack: Different cells.

Cristina: Yeah. Okay.

Jack: That's why I think their argument is that even if they're trying to make a checklist, but the problem is it makes it difficult to discover what is life that isn't made of cells. Yes, that's where it f**** up. Maybe it's a useful measure that we say all things made of cells are alive, but there are things that aren't made of cells that are alive too. Like fire.

Cristina: Yeah, like fire. What's anything else like fire?

Jack: Well, something Very similar to fire is lightning, which is a form of fire, essentially. It's also constructed of nitrogen and oxygen as a response to its environment. And it does not age, which is interesting. Neither does fire. Neither does fire.

Cristina: It's just fire in a different form, though not necessarily. Okay.

Jack: Because its function is completely different and it's sort of composed of a chain reaction in a different way. I guess fire is also. Everything is a chain reaction. Think about it.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: Yeah. But what's interesting enough, after we have a rubric like this designed, we start getting into the weeds, which it gets weird. It gets really, really, really, really odd as you continue to move forward. Because if we use this rubric and apply it to a fetus, okay. Then we can definitely say even if a fetus is made of cells, this is assuming. We're not saying that all things with cells are alive.

Cristina: No, we're just going based on the checklist.

Jack: Yes, Just this checklist.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: So based on this checklist, like a fetus breathes through its mother, a fetus consumes nutrition through its mother. It receives food and it poops outward through the umbilical cord. And it receives its oxygen through the umbilical cord and it grows with those things. But it doesn't reproduce, which is problematic because you're a living thing that doesn't reproduce.

Jack: And a fetus isn't a baby yet a fetus is just a fetus. Unless you're also saying the sperm is also a baby. But those doesn't work that way. So fetus does not reproduce. Thus by extension it is not alive. Alive.

Cristina: What, so you're saying only once it's born, it's alive?

Jack: Only once it's born, it's once. Well, it doesn't need to be born, but once it has functional sexual organs.

Cristina: Oh, okay.

Jack: That's when it crosses the threshold and can complete the checklist.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: Now I think the best approach is a combination of both systems. Right? So we say all things made of cells are factually alive.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: And anything that completes this checklist.

Cristina: And.

Jack: And yes.

Cristina: All right. So this thing is alive even if it doesn't complete the checklist because it's made out of cells.

Jack: Exactly. So you're made of cells. Check. You're in. Yes, you've made it. That means you don't need anything else on the list.

Cristina: All right, but if you don't have cells, then we check the checklist.

Jack: Yes, check the checklist. You compared to the checklist and you function good. You are a living thing.

Cristina: All right.

Jack: That does not mean conscious. There's no way to tell.

Cristina: Nope.

Jack: Fire could totally not be conscious.

Cristina: Totally could be.

Jack: And it totally could be. It totally could be. There's no way to know.

Cristina: There's no way to know.

Jack: All of it could be intentional. Yeah, there's no way to know. We can't predict fire. Just the same way we can't predict a person. Yeah, it's random. It's chaotic. It moves in ways we can't assume. We can be. Like it's headed that way, but you know, we can never. Like we're gonna go that way and stop preemptively. It's like. But it turned that f*** away instead. There's no way to know. But following the checklist, now let's. Let's use that same checklist and compete with spur compared to sperm.

Cristina: Oh, okay.

Jack: So sperm doesn't breathe, doesn't need oxygen. Sperm doesn't eat. Sperm does not excrete. Sperm doesn't grow. Sperm doesn't reproduce. All it does is respond to its environment. That's it.

Cristina: So it's not alive. Except for that. It's made out of.

Jack: Except for that it's made out of cells.

Cristina: Yeah. So it checks and it has. It's alive even though it doesn't have anything.

Jack: Unless we're saying the checklist is the only way.

Cristina: Yes, but I like using both.

Jack: I think made of cells equals alive or complete the checklist.

Cristina: Yes, I think that's right. How about a tornado? Since you talked about fire and lightning. Is tornado way off.

Jack: A tornado doesn't reproduce.

Cristina: No. Too little tornadoes.

Jack: Hurricane can make tornadoes.

Cristina: Does that count? Does that even though it's one giant thing. I don't know.

Jack: Why does size matter?

Cristina: Does size matter? I don't know. No, it doesn't.

Jack: Okay, well, let's look at the checklist. Needs to consume.

Cristina: Yes. Does it?

Jack: Yes. Water.

Cristina: Water.

Jack: Needs water.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: And needs air.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: Doesn't leave waste relative to air or water, though. It doesn't consume those things and then get rid of something. It doesn't leave carbon behind.

Cristina: It leaves water behind.

Jack: That's not waste. It's using it, but it's not getting rid of anything. That's what its body is made out of. Decomposing. If anything it grows, does grow, it can produce reproduction. We can assume the tornado itself. Yes, but then the tornado would in any case be like a sperm. It can't reproduce itself.

Cristina: Yeah, but then it won't be alive because it doesn't.

Jack: Doesn't complete a checklist. And it's not Made of cells.

Cristina: Yep.

Jack: Pretty simple checklist. It's easy to check things off suddenly and we can measure anything. That is the usefulness of something like this. We can immediately just say whether something is alive or not by putting it to this checklist. Easy, simple, easy peasy, lemon squeezy. One thing I do find interesting is the idea of a God that isn't made of cells and also doesn't breathe oxygen and. And also doesn't eat food, and also doesn't excrete and also doesn't grow and also doesn't reproduce. It does reproduce. That's why we're here.

Cristina: That's why everything's here. That's why everything's here.

Jack: So it can produce, reproduce, but it's not made of cells. And he can respond to its environment. That's how he knows good or bad and gets angry or whatever and rearranges things accordingly.

Cristina: I learned so many things from the checklist.

Jack: Yes. God's not alive.

Cristina: He's not alive.

Jack: He's Galvan.

Cristina: He's a Galvan.

Jack: Yes.

Cristina: Oh, wait, I forgot about Galvan.

Jack: Yeah.

Cristina: Okay. Do we have a definition for Galvan?

Jack: Well, for Galvan, we don't know what things are Galvan. We have no checklist for Galvan because we needed to create a checklist for life that did not change first. Again, the one thing we know in Galvan is things there could be consciousness, things there could move, and things there could.

Cristina: So they. They may check off one or two.

Jack: Things off the list, but movement is. I don't know if it's a requirement. No, neither is aging. Something that is Galvan could potentially age, but it's also not in the checklist for life.

Cristina: No.

Jack: So they have things that could exist in both. We know things that could exist in both. And with those leftover things, we can then begin to look. So things that age. Some things that are alive age. Most things that are alive age, but not all things that are alive. So maybe there are Galvan things that age but aren't alive.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: And maybe there are Galvan things that move aren't alive. Maybe there's Galvan things that respond to their environment but aren't alive.

Cristina: Are you putting sperm and God and Galvan?

Jack: Yes, both for Galvin.

Cristina: Oh, okay.

Jack: Except sperm is made of cells. Oh, yeah.

Cristina: Already? Yeah.

Jack: Sperm is live because.

Cristina: But God and that. Tornado. Not tornado.

Jack: Hurricane.

Cristina: Hurricane. That. Yes. God and that hurricane.

Jack: Hurricane are Calvin. They are animated, but not alive.

Cristina: Okay. We cannot prove that they're cautious or not cautious, because we can't prove Any of it to anything. So.

Jack: So then assuming that we have things that are filling these rubrics, we can say that sperm and fetuses and just plants and whatever. Anything made of cells alive. But then we have fire that's not made of cells, but does check off the entire list. Thus alive.

Cristina: Thus alive.

Jack: Yes, yes. And if it wasn't for the fact that a fetus is made of cells, it would be Galvin. But it's made of cells. Yes, so it's alive. If it wasn't for a fact that sperm doesn't check s*** off the list other than responding to its environment. Yeah, it would be Galvan. But it's made of cells, so it's alive. Meanwhile, God Galvin. Any helium based life would then be Galvan. You could come, you could touch things on the scale and not check off all of them, but still not be made of cells.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: And be Galvan.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: God Galvan. Like a previous episode, we were talking about shadow people. They're probably conscious. They move, they respond to their environment. But their physics are different. They don't necessarily breathe air.

Cristina: We don't.

Jack: They might reproduce.

Cristina: They might.

Jack: We don't know.

Cristina: We don't know much about them.

Jack: Yeah, they would seem to behave alive. Yes, except they're not made of cells. They don't check off the whole list. No, they're Galvan because they are animate and functional and responding to their environment. Maybe aging, maybe could even die.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: But aren't made of cells and don't check off the life checklist. Yes, but we know they're not like a rock.

Cristina: No rock. Okay. A rock isn't alive.

Jack: A rock, as far as we know, is obviously. Well, we know it's definitely not alive. But the potential that it's not even Galvin is there.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: Because there could be a third thing we don't even have a name for because we just made up a f****** name right now.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Add a third name and it doesn't fit Galvin checklist or Alive checklist. But there is consciousness somehow. And that could be a third thing of its own. If it's nothing that we would say is behaving as an animate object that doesn't seem to do anything except perceive, which is weird, but possible because that's what a vegetable is.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: And it could totally be haunted.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: So we don't know where that lands now, to give Galvin a definition. Right. I guess it would be a being that's not carbon based but still has capacity to be conscious. It doesn't need to be conscious, but it could be conscious. And it needs to. There should be a checklist that in the future we can make that should contain maybe something Galvan does move. Maybe it needs to move.

Cristina: But what about Frankenstein? That was what was based on. But because of this checklist and because of what we just came up with, is it alive?

Jack: Then he's made out of cells.

Cristina: Exactly. That's exactly what I was thinking.

Jack: Like, yeah, he's made out of cells. Frankenstein is.

Cristina: He's not a gallon. Even though he might be inspired by that idea. But our new checklist makes him alive.

Jack: Yes, because we're including being made of cells. And all the separate limbs he's made out of only function, because Cells.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: So he's definitely alive. Alive.

Cristina: What?

Jack: But now, what's interesting about this is I would argue that something Galvin has to move. We'll put that in that checklist. It has to move. Now, something alive doesn't have to move, but something Galvin does.

Cristina: What about God?

Jack: Well, God can move.

Cristina: How do we know?

Jack: Well, he can do things. He's allegedly been places and he can create. That's all part of emotion.

Cristina: Okay. I guess creating would be part of motion. Just the idea of he has shown.

Jack: People his shoulder, unquote.

Cristina: Oh, yeah.

Jack: And he had to move to do that or something. So based on that, he's Galvin.

Cristina: There's movement.

Jack: There's movement. So he's Galvin because there's movement. I don't know about aging. I feel like that one could be wrong.

Cristina: Aging needs to be there.

Jack: No, like it shouldn't be there because aging feels like a weird one.

Cristina: Aging. I don't know.

Jack: We can't prove shadow people age.

Cristina: No, you can't prove. I don't think aging needs to be there.

Jack: That's what I'm saying. I don't think aging should be. Be there at all.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: And now, so. So I guess Galvin is pretty much anything that's not in the life list. So then our Luciferins, the films called Luciferins, are they alive or are they Galvan? They're made of cells.

Cristina: They're made of cells. They're alive.

Jack: Yeah. They're almost cells themselves.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Which means. Yeah, they're alive.

Cristina: They're alive.

Jack: Even if they don't eat.

Cristina: Nope.

Jack: Because they bypass the checklist. If you're missing something from the checklist. Are you made of cells?

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Okay, you're in.

Cristina: Yeah. That's it.

Jack: Simple. No question, no doubt in anybody's mind.

Cristina: All those vampires, werewolves, zombies, they're alive.

Jack: All alive. All alive.

Cristina: All of it.

Jack: Even like a fully. If zombies weren't barely alive. If they were, like, if you truly murder somebody to the point that heart stops beating and everything. That at least was a living creature.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: It was never a Galvan creature.

Cristina: No.

Jack: And if it reanimates, it's again, a living creature.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: Because it's still made of cells.

Cristina: Yes. Yeah, I think we figured it out. Yeah.

Jack: And that means that turtles, for a fact, are alive. Are alive.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Because we'll never say turtles aren't. But they don't age. And age is a weird one to have there at all.

Cristina: And jellyfish that don't even look like jellyfish. Yeah.

Jack: They look like some whole other s***. They look like a trash bag in the water.

Cristina: They look like aliens.

Jack: Yeah. It's really weird.

Cristina: But do you know any more Galvan creatures? I guess we'd have to. I don't know. That's. That's a tough one.

Jack: No, not necessarily, but that's the problem. We need to then make a checklist of things that we can call Galvan. And I think the only thing that makes sense for now is movement.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: Because we don't know how. Something like. I'm assuming that Galvan things will behave similar to living things in that most of them can move. And that's a good start.

Cristina: Yes. Okay, let me think. Something that can move.

Jack: Lightning.

Cristina: Lightning is alive.

Jack: It checks off some of the things on the checklist, but it's not made of cells and it doesn't check off all of the things on the checklist.

Cristina: Yeah. So lightning and fire go in there?

Jack: Well, no, because G. Gal. A. Fire completes the checklist.

Cristina: Oh, yeah.

Jack: Fire is alive while lightning is Galvan.

Cristina: Yep. How many things make the checklist that aren't made out of cells? Is fire the only one?

Jack: Fire seems to be the only one, though. Fire is the only one at the moment.

Cristina: Awesome.

Jack: But fire fits everything. A human fits. Consumes matter. Humans consume organic matter. Respiration. Both. Fire inhales oxygen. Humans inhale oxygen. A screecher. Fire exhales carbon dioxide. Humans exhale carbon dioxide. Growth. Fire grows as it consumes. So do people. They grow as they consume. Reproduction. Fires can break off into smaller fires that keep moving and then grow on their own. By consuming, humans can reproduce, have babies that go on consuming and growing, and they can then do the same thing.

Cristina: So is the sun a living planet with, like, fire creatures on it or something?

Jack: Yes. You know, the difference is that the sun does age. The sun is a Different kind of fire.

Cristina: The south.

Jack: Yeah. It has a timer that's internal and ticking, and it's slowly aging, getting older and will die of old age. Something. Yeah. So it not only fits the entire rubric in which fire will definitely. Here's the thing. It doesn't actually. Because it doesn't need oxygen.

Cristina: Doesn't need oxygen.

Jack: It doesn't need oxygen. And it's not made of cells. So it's missing one thing in the checklist, and it's not made of cells. The sun is Galvan.

Cristina: What? How is a fire alive? The sun is Galvan.

Jack: How is lightning? Galvan? Okay, the sun and lightning are closer related than the fire. The fire in the sun.

Cristina: Okay. What? How about lava?

Jack: Lava. It leaves waste. But it doesn't grow. It does age.

Cristina: Does age. It does grow. When it turns into. What's the.

Jack: No, it's not multiplying. It's not getting bigger. It's rolling over things that might be higher up. And it just looks bigger. Yeah, but it's not growing. There's not more of it.

Cristina: So it's not alive.

Jack: No, it's not even Galvan.

Cristina: Or Galvan. All right.

Jack: Like it has movement. It has movement. It definitely has movement, but it doesn't reproduce.

Cristina: I'm thinking something Galvin reproduce.

Jack: I'm thinking something Galvin might need to.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: I think lightning reproduces.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: We can see a bigger lightning bolt shred into a million smaller ones, and they break up into a billion smaller ones until they all celestial.

Cristina: You said like angels. Well, we have no idea what they do, so we can't say.

Jack: Well, based on what we know of angels, the lore of angels, they aren't made of cells. They don't breathe oxygen, but they fit the perception of life. They seem conscious, they move of their own accord. They respond to their environment. They can theoretically die.

Cristina: They seem a lot like us.

Jack: Yes, except they're not made of cells. They don't breathe, they don't poo.

Cristina: So put them in the Galvan.

Jack: They're Galvan. Like God.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: Like God and lightning.

Cristina: Yes, and the sun and the sun.

Jack: God, lightning.

Cristina: But does the God reproduce angels?

Jack: God can reproduce.

Cristina: The sun, though.

Jack: The sun doesn't reproduce. No.

Cristina: So is that still Galvan? Interesting, because now we're having for sure movement and reproduction has to be there.

Jack: S***. Do angels reproduce? Because I don't. Fair enough. Fair enough.

Cristina: We don't really know if angels reproduce or not. Maybe they do.

Jack: And if they don't, then they're not Galvin.

Cristina: Then they're not Gavin. I guess.

Jack: But they seem to be the closest thing to life, I would say. I would argue that angels and shadow people are the same s***, even if they're not. I mean, technically they are, but outside that point, if we went like biblical angels. Yes, and shadow people, then they behave the way humans do and seem to think and can talk and can respond to their environment.

Cristina: They're for sure conscious.

Jack: Sure, for sure. Conscious. But they don't reproduce. So that means reproduction cannot be in that checklist either.

Cristina: Okay, then. So then movement is the only thing.

Jack: We have so far.

Cristina: All right? It's just that you can't. You don't have the. The requirements for living. But you can move. So you're. You're a Galvan.

Jack: No, because lava can move and we can. And we know for a fact it's not reproducing. We know for a fact it's not behaving of any accord. It's just like water rolling. But lightning can reproduce.

Cristina: So then what's the requirement for Galvin?

Jack: I don't know.

Cristina: Judging.

Jack: Okay, fair enough, fair enough, fair enough. What if something galvanized checks off many things off of the life list.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: But not all of them.

Cristina: All right?

Jack: So you are either alive, in which you're either made of cells, or check off the whole list. Galvin not made of cells. And check off some of the things on the list or some third other s***.

Cristina: Okay, so then what was the one that we were saying? It only has movement, so it doesn't count. Yes, Lava only has movement.

Jack: But then we. We have four. Four tiers. Alive.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: Galvan.

Cristina: Galvan.

Jack: Whatever movement by itself is. And then something that doesn't even have that.

Cristina: There's nothing that doesn't have movement.

Jack: A rock. It moves a rock. A rock doesn't move by itself.

Cristina: Mountains move.

Jack: Mountains also don't move by themselves.

Cristina: They grow. They don't move.

Jack: They shrink.

Cristina: They shrink. That's something.

Jack: No, no. So that's four tiers. Alive. Galvan motion and no motion. All right, so alive you have. You're either made of cells or check off the whole list.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: Galvin not made of cells. Check off most of the list. Motion. Not alive. Not. Galvin, you don't check off. You're not made of cells and you only check off motion, which isn't even part of the list.

Cristina: Nope. That's just its own thing.

Jack: That's its own thing. If you can move, lava can move.

Cristina: Planets can move.

Jack: Planets could move. See, we have similarities. Now, water is in perpetual motion in the ocean, yes.

Cristina: So what's Atlas called?

Jack: That's just motion, I guess. We don't have a name for that.

Cristina: It's just things that move. All right. And things that don't move.

Jack: So biological life form and fire.

Cristina: Alive for fact, yes.

Jack: Shadow people, celestials, God, lightning, the sun. Galvin. All Galvin?

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: They don't necessarily check off many things. Well, they check off many things, but not all of them. The sun doesn't reproduce and doesn't breathe.

Cristina: That sounds right.

Jack: It does leave residue. It radiates parts of it, little by little. Excretion of sorts, of it can also get bigger. It ages. That's not even part of the f****** checklist.

Cristina: That's not. But it's so.

Jack: But it takes nutrition. Anything that lands into it, it consumes. It can't reproduce, but it grows. It has excretion. Some of the things on there make it.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: God is weird because he doesn't satisfy a lot of this.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: But he reproduces. D***. He only checks off one of the things on the list. So then checking off anything on the list.

Cristina: Okay, okay.

Jack: Without all of the list.

Cristina: Yes. Is galvanized.

Jack: Just one thing on this list. If you reproduce, Galvin, if you grow Galvin, if you excrete, Galvan, if you breathe Galvan, if you eat Galvin, you don't need all of them, you just need one of them. If you do all of them, you're alive.

Cristina: A virus.

Jack: Virus is alive. No virus is Galvan not alive. A virus is Galvin. Because a virus, it's creep. It excretes. And a virus can reproduce.

Cristina: It's not made out of cells.

Jack: It's not.

Cristina: Okay, then it's Galvin.

Jack: It's Galvin.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: In fact, it kills cells.

Cristina: That's true.

Jack: Or infects them. Or makes them sick.

Cristina: Or it makes them sick.

Jack: Yep. Yeah, but it is Galvan.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: And we were struggling. Science has struggled for very long to say whether a virus is alive or not. Well, you know what? It's close, but it's not alive.

Cristina: Yep.

Jack: It's next best thing. It's Galvin.

Cristina: It's God. No.

Jack: God and a virus are more or less the same.

Cristina: It's more or less the same. Who knew?

Jack: So then, what else can we put on that list? We got the sun, we got God, we got angels, we got shadow people, we got lightning. That's an interesting one.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: Lightning reproduces. Lightning breathes.

Cristina: What else? What else is there?

Jack: And then there's the motionless.

Cristina: The motionless water. Yes. Lava.

Jack: Lava.

Cristina: Wind.

Jack: Wind. Wind is in Motion.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: And not one of those things we would say is conscious. We also don't know. There's no way to know.

Cristina: There's no way to know.

Jack: There's no way to know. But they do have motion.

Cristina: Yeah. But no matter where you're on this list, we don't know if you have conscious. Like, you'd be a non moving object, and we still have no idea.

Jack: Yeah, yeah, yeah. You could be conscious in any case. But I guess the ultimate idea would be to try to pin consciousness down, because we. If we can prove that the. In the entire time when we're thinking God, when we're thinking angels, when we're thinking shadow people, we are thinking of things that we can at least say are similar to us in some manner, shape, or form.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: And we know we're biological, so we'll just chalk off anything biological and throw it into that same thing. Because it's probably, if any. If biology is the root, then for a fact. But if not, here are things that are similar.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: And the less similar you are, the further down this scale you are. But the closer to us you are, the more likely you are as conscious as me perceiving at this moment and thinking about it.

Cristina: Mm. So the only important thing is looking for, when we're looking for life is the living list.

Jack: Yeah. So we're comparing everything to the living checklist. Yes.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: And then from the living checklist, we then attach rules to the checklist, rather than say, if you make the checklist, you are one, and if you don't, well, you're not. And instead of that, we'll say the degree of checklist completion. Number one, are you made of cells? Yes. Alive. Okay. Not made of cells. Let's move on to number two. There's a checklist. If you can meet all the requirements on the checklist, you are alive.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: Great.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: Now, fair enough. We can say organic in place of alive, because organic inherently means alive. A hundred percent of anything that is made of cells is by default alive. So then we have a tier system. You're either organic, alive, Galvan, movement, moving. Good moving. Or some other s***. Or inanimate. Then. Then we finally hit inanimate.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: There you go. Five steps. Are you organic? Sweet. That means you accomplish everything else under you except inanimate. Inanimate is the absence of all the others.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: So you are moving. You do complete the checklist. Some of the things, you complete the whole thing. And you're made of cells. Organic. Organic is, for a fact, the goal. Okay, so you're not organic, are you? Galvin, do you? Or well, are you alive?

Cristina: Are you alive? Yes.

Jack: So then. Interesting, because that puts fire by saying organic over alive.

Cristina: It's not organic, but it's alive.

Jack: Fire is not organic, but it's alive. Yeah.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: So we are organic and we are identical to fire in everything, with the exception that fire isn't organic, but it is alive.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: We're organic, therefore alive, therefore Galvan, therefore moving. But fire isn't organic, but it is alive, therefore Galvan, therefore moving.

Cristina: Yes. Does that work with everything?

Jack: Well, God, celestials, shadow people, lightning, they are all. They're not alive, but they're all Galvan and they're all moving. And lava, air, water, are not organic, not alive, not galvanized, but they're all moving.

Cristina: Yes. Okay. And then inanimate is just.

Jack: Then inanimate. Okay, so water is an animate object.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: As is lava, as is air. All animate. They're not inanimate.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: Interesting. Have we designed. I think that's the proper checklist.

Cristina: Yes. We did it.

Jack: Interesting, interesting, interesting.

Cristina: And the checklist is called the Life checklist. No. Maybe.

Jack: D***. I don't know what the name of the checklist would be because ultimately the purpose of the checklist, of anything like looking for life or whatever the f*** we're trying to do.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Is to. Even if we're trying to find something in any of these categories, we're also ultimately only doing it to try to find consciousness. That is the ultimate goal of any of this. But because the idea is we find a cell, a different planet. Well, that means that life can happen, therefore there could be more complicated life out there. That's really what we're looking for.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: Where life could happen again.

Cristina: Okay. So it's really the most important is just organic, really.

Jack: No. Because you could get through all these others that. I mean, if we found organic matters elsewhere. That's way more astounding.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Because if life happened in some other way. Well, duh. Well, duh. What are the odds that it just. Exactly the same. Unless there's only one way it could happen.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: That would be one way. There's only one way it could happen and that's it. Or we have a common ancestor somehow. That'd be the other problem. So it's either life can only happen one way, we'll have way more questions if we do find organic life. Way more questions than answers. Yeah, but if we just find like helium based life or some s***, we'd be like, yep, that makes sense.

Cristina: We just call that a living thing.

Jack: No, that would be Galvin.

Cristina: Galvin.

Jack: Yeah. Because it doesn't necessarily have to fill out the check. It could fill out the checklist and thus be alive.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: It could also not.

Cristina: Yeah. Okay.

Jack: So the argument to be made is fire might be the only living thing that we can as of now, for a fact, pin down. And isn't organic.

Cristina: That's pretty amazing because then that really does show that there's other.

Jack: Oh, s***.

Cristina: What?

Jack: Oh, no. But it's organic. Okay. I was gonna say the Luciferians, but they're all made of. I was like, what the f***? They don't eat. But no, anything that is organic makes it by default.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: So then fire. If we can find anything else.

Cristina: So we have a second example of life.

Jack: Yes. Isn't organic. We have one example of life that isn't organic.

Cristina: So it's possible to find others.

Jack: Yes. We have simplified it.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: For the scientists.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: So that they can use. Right there we have proof. It is possible to fill out the checklist.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: And not be organic.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: The problem is we're looking for organic, which is stupid because what are the odds now if it did happen? Holy s***. But we didn't answer. S***. We just opened a million doors.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: Which is. F***. Do we have a common ancestor? Or is f****** biology the only way to do it? Or like, what the f***?

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: So way more questions. But as of now, we have non biological life. If we follow this checklist.

Cristina: And that makes it. That it's possible.

Jack: That makes it possible. Because fire because. Is alive.

Cristina: We're not alone on this earth.

Jack: And it's possible there's other things that we're just not thinking about.

Cristina: No.

Jack: Because at least things that are galvan are a whole other kind of thing.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: That is what we were basically trying to say was life before. But our checklist was too shaky.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: So anything Calvin. It lit. That word is a synonym for alive, by the way. Anybody confused it means animated object. It's a lot. It's alive. The point of that is that it's another word for live. But we're not using alive because you're not completing the life checklist that we made up. Yeah.

Cristina: So.

Jack: Well, actually, the checklist was already made up by scientists. We just removed two things as obligations and said that anything else you have to meet, you can't not not meet it.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Unless you're organic. Then doesn't matter. You've bypassed the checklist. You start at organic, move on to the life checklist. Move on to the Galvan checklist. And then finally. Can you move?

Cristina: Can you.

Jack: Most of the things. All the way through Galvan. So organic, alive. Galvan and moving can move most of the things if you don't fill out anything else. But you can move. You're at least not inanimate.

Cristina: Yeah, we're not interested in inanimate. Inanimate.

Jack: Yes. Because that would be the hardest thing to prove. Conscious.

Cristina: Yes. And we're not really interested in moving either.

Jack: We're less interested than all the other stuff, but we're more interested than we.

Cristina: Are Galvin, I think is when it's like.

Jack: Because Galvin gets really interesting.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Reproduce. Wow.

Cristina: Well, I don't know. I think we're more. It's. It's gotta be over, Gavin.

Jack: It's gotta be Galvin or higher.

Cristina: I think it has to be over Galvin.

Jack: Why?

Cristina: I don't think we're interested in Galvin. What are the things in Galvin again?

Jack: Celestials. Shadow people.

Cristina: Yeah, that's why. That's why. Like, how do you prove any of that?

Jack: Lightning is Galvan.

Cristina: Yeah, that's why we're not interested in lightning. Although we're not interested in fire. And we already proved that that's alive, so never mind.

Jack: Sun is Galvan and it's super related to fire. Like lightning.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: Wouldn't be. We be.

Cristina: The scientists don't care.

Jack: It would be like. Look at it like this, right? We have us at organic, thus alive.

Cristina: Yes.

Jack: And we complete the whole checklist. Yeah, but also sperm doesn't complete s*** on the checklist. But it's alive. That's the same as saying there is fire. That completes the checklist. So it's alive. But lightning and the sun don't complete the checklist. So they're Galvin. Sperm is to us what lightning and the sun are to fire. It's one step under. Yeah, except it's the same. But not.

Cristina: Yeah, it's the same.

Jack: The difference is that sperm is in fact organic. Thus it bypasses everything and comes to the top.

Cristina: Unfair.

Jack: But it works. Anyways. That's fascinating as f***. I guess we have a rubric now to determine whether something is alive or not. So like I said, go find. I guess no longer look for an inanimate object. Look for any variant of animate object. Go scoop up some lava with your hand and make it listen to the podcast.

Cristina: I thought you were just talking to your walls. Why you gotta scoop lava now?

Jack: Because walls are inanimate and we're no longer interested in. I began this episode. Wrong.

Cristina: Okay.

Jack: So they have to scoop up, bare minimum, something moving.

Cristina: Like lava.

Jack: Like lava. Just scoop up.

Cristina: Scoop up some wind.

Jack: Scoop up some wind and you can listen to the show.

Cristina: Yeah.

Jack: If it responds, then.

Cristina: Mm.

Jack: Interesting. Interesting.

Cristina: I think we got it.

Jack: I think. I think we nailed something down.

Cristina: We're scientists. Right here.

Jack: At least we simplified it for scientists. Anyways, if you guys got. If you guys like weird discussions like this. There are many discussions of this nature. We haven't done one this detailed in a while, but there's a bunch of weird s*** out there. You can go find out what it would be like if we, like, powered society with a potato, if you want to know.

Cristina: Oh, yeah, Remember that? Yeah, The. The machine. We had a time machine for a short.

Jack: Time machine. We. For a short time. We literally still have that time machine.

Cristina: We never used it. You used it to stop us from.

Jack: Killing cat people or something.

Cristina: You wanted to kill a cat people? I don't know.

Jack: Whatever. The point is. Point is we got. We got episodes where things happen.

Cristina: Things happen. Yeah.

Jack: Yeah. And we look for life in a different episode. We actively search for life. So, yeah, go listen to those episodes. Listen to other things. I think we just had a questions episode or some s***. Anyways, if you want to find that stuff, you can find it at the official website@greatthoughts.info or on Apple Podcast, Spotify, or anywhere you get your podcasts.

Cristina: And you can reach us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and TikTokod.

Jack: Yes. And you can subscribe and rate the show. And if you feel so inclined, you can always review the show.

Cristina: Give us your rating. We eat that. We eat that for dinner.

Jack: Yes. Yes, we do. You don't rate us, we starve.

Cristina: Yes. If you don't rate us, we starve. Help. And let someone who might like this show know about it.

Jack: Word of mouth. Tell people that we've solved the problem of life and then show them what we've come up with.

Cristina: And then show them your missing arm because you scooped up Blobber. Again, this has been the Just Conversation podcast. Take nothing personal and thanks for listening. Bye.

Jack: And balance.

Cristina: Balance. Yeah.

Jack: Creation and Atheos. Destruction and shaggy reason in the flying Spaghetti Monster. And chaos and Kek.

Cristina: What about Chuck Norris?

Jack: He's not a God.

Cristina: He's not? No.

Jack: I guess he's like a trickster.

Cristina: Yeah. Yeah. I guess he's more like.

Jack: He exists in sort of the pockets of f****** reality.

Cristina: If anything, he's a reality breaker.

Jack: Yeah. He's like Deadpool.

Cristina: Yeah. Yep.

Jack: Deadpool could be Shaggy that's so overpowered because he has this thing that makes no sense and cannot be explained in any f****** way, which is the ability to leave a panel. It's too overpowered. It seems so simple, but in any comic book page, he's basically invincible.

Cristina: Good morning. Good morning. The Just Conversation podcast is hosted by Christina Collazo and Jack Thomas, produced by Lynn Taylor and published by greatthoughts.info art by Zero Lupo and logo by Seth McCallister, with social media managed by Amber Black.

JCP 4.11 10ish Podcast & Baby Shaking

Brandon Coffman, 10ish Podcast, Genocidal Jack, The Just Conversation Podcast, Comedy, Parenting, Ethics, Morality, Death, Life, Podcast, Guest, Radio, Discussion, Comedy, Countdown, top 10 list, philosophy, Politically Incorrect

Guest Brandon Coffman of the 10ish Podcast joins Jack to discuss everything from politics and the greatness of president Donald J. Trump to Baby Shaking Activism and Fight Club.

Rambling 105: Scooby Doo: The Chimera Experiment

Scooby Doo, Science, Research, Episode, Comedy, Discussion, Cartoon, Animation, Anime, Data, Conspiracy, Theory, Podcast, Episode, New Episode, Zero Lupo, Art, Artistic

Unpacking what it would take to make a real Scooby Doo.

Story:
After receiving a recon mission from the Illuminati, the clone duo set out to learn about a mysterious dog named Scooby Doo. The investigation leads to a scientist performing chimera experiments in Chinese facilities, dark secrets, erased and missing documents, a conspiracy to cover up the truth about hybrid creatures and more. What’s more disturbing of all is what they discover when all the information is put together. Find out more on this episode of Just Conversation.

+Episode Details

Remember to leaves us a rating wherever you listen to podcast!

Art by @Zero_Lupo on Instagram

Topics Discussed

  • Scientist Juan Carlos
  • Chimera Experiment
  • Talking Animals
  • Meowth from Pokemon
  • Animal Intellect
  • Great Ape Chimera
  • Scooby’s Intellect
  • The Mystery Gang
  • Family Tree
  • Peta
  • Secret Laboratory

Our Links:

Official Website - https://greythoughts.info/podcast

Twitter - https://twitter.com/JustConvoPod

Facebook - https://facebook.com/justconvopod

Instagram - https://instagram.com/justconvopod

JCP 4.09 Genuine Chit-Chat & Universal Scales

The Just Conversation Podcast, Language, Reality, Metaphysics, Mike Burton, Genuine Chit-Chat, Universal Scales, Comedy, Guest, Discussion, Podcasting, Physics, Faith, Religion

Guest Mike Burton, Host of Genuine Chit-Chat podcast, joins Jack to discuss religion and philosophy in intricate detail.

+Episode Details

Remember to leaves us a rating wherever you listen to podcast!

Topics Discussed

  • Politics- Earth’s Panic Attack
  • The Smart Phone World- What We Know
  • The Love of Learning- Atheism
  • Theism- Agnosticism
  • Hermetic Principles
  • Nature’s Polarity and Balance
  • Shape of Reality
  • Proof of Divinity
  • Understanding God
  • Universal Consciousness
  • Creationism
  • Power of Perspective
  • Human Capacity
  • Subjective Reality
  • Struggle is the Point

l

Mike Burton & Genuine Chit-Chat Links

Email - genuinechitchat@outlook.com

Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/GenuineChitChat

Twitter - https://twitter.com/GenuineChitChat

Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/genuine_chitchat/

Apple Podcasts - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/genuine-chit-chat/id1280472886

Podbean - https://genuinechitchat.podbean.com/

Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClQvgois9knDkFvjqcpoQtw

Star Wars Comics in Canon - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/comics-in-motion/id1350425403

l

Our Links:

Official Website - https://greythoughts.info/podcast

Twitter - https://twitter.com/JustConvoPod

Facebook - https://facebook.com/justconvopod

Instagram - https://instagram.com/justconvopod

Rambling 103: Deja Vu Theories

Deja vu Theories, The Just Conversation Podcast, Science, Episode, New Episode, Discussion, Time Travel, Research, Comedy, Fun, Funny

What are the possible explanations for Deja Vu? Are you reliving a moment? Are you seeing the future? Answers to this questions and many more on this episode of Just Conversation!

Story:
The duo return to their investigation on DeJa Vu to dig deeper and pick apart the concept and its origins with newly discovered information. Will they find a definitive answer? Or just circle infinite possibilities trying to please the Illuminati HQ CEO? Find out!

+Episode Details

Remember to leaves us a rating wherever you listen to podcast!

Art by @Zero_Lupo on Instagram

Topics Discussed:

  • Spectrum of Deja Vu
  • All Things Happened
  • Reincarnation
  • Deja Vu Causes
  • Aliens
  • Time Loops
  • Subconscious Memory
  • Types of Deja Vu
  • Dejaville

Our Links:

Official Website - https://greythoughts.info/podcast

Twitter - https://twitter.com/JustConvoPod

Facebook - https://facebook.com/justconvopod

Instagram - https://instagram.com/justconvopod

Rambling 97: The Nature of Evil

The Just Conversation Podcast, Evil, Scary, Corrupt, Demon, Ghost, Crime

What is evil? Have we ever witnessed it first hand? Could we find an example if we tried? Unpacking the nature of evil on this episode of Just Conversation.

Story:
Tired of the left/right swing of social politics consuming the world and blind comments by misguided and uninformed people panicked on social media because of news outlets and political points of view, the clone duo decide to deep dive on the nature of evil and find out if they could find proof of its existence or if the concept was entire made up.

+Episode Details

Topics Discussed

  • Defining Evil
  • Was Hitler Evil?
  • Is Thanos Evil?
  • Is Evil Possible?
  • Is Murder Inherently Evil?
  • Are Pedophiles Evil?
  • Evil Evolves
  • Evil Discovered
  • Examples of Evil
  • Can Nature Breed Evil?
  • Does Motivation Dictate Evil?
  • Is Jehovah Evil?
  • Plato’s Theory of Forms
  • Is Pure Good Possible?

l

None of This is Real Podcast

(Promo at the Start of the show)

Find them on:

Apple Podcasts - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/none-of-this-is-real/id1439588586

Instagram - @noneofthisisrealpodcast

l

Our Links

Official Website - https://greythoughts.info/podcast

Twitter - https://twitter.com/JustConvoPod

Facebook - https://facebook.com/justconvopod

Instagram - https://instagram.com/justconvopod

JCP 4.05 HollowN9ne Network & Simulation Theory

Dave the Klone, Hollow 9ine Network, The Just Conversation Podcast, Simulation THeory, Red Pill, The Matrix, Discussion, Fun

Guest Dave ‘The Klone’ of ‘The Hollow9ine Network joins us to discuss the theoretical implications of The Matrix films, the repetitive nature of the universe and the ever collapsing coronaverse.

+ Episode Details

Remember to leaves us a rating wherever you listen to podcasts!

Topics Discussed

  • The Age of Information
  • Alien Life
  • Particle Physics
  • Branching Realities
  • The End of Humanity
  • The Covid Response
  • Problems with Subjective Reality
  • Russian Doll Universe
  • Consciousness
  • The Red Pill
  • Simulated Reality
  • The Matrix
  • Are we NPCs?
  • Self Help Community
  • Is Truth Knowable?
  • In the Beginning there was…
  • Metaphysics

l

Dave’s Links

HollowN9ne:

Radiohaver Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/RadioHaver/

l

Our Links

Official Website - https://greythoughts.info/podcast

Twitter - https://twitter.com/JustConvoPod

Facebook - https://facebook.com/justconvopod

Instagram - https://instagram.com/justconvopod

Rambling 87: Consequentialism

Domino, DOmino EFfect, Consequentialism, Butterfly Effect, Philosophy, Law, Theory, Logic, Reason

Are means justified by their ends? Discussing the philosophy of Consequentialism and Utilitarianism.

 Story:
Debating whether or not the engineer Lind is going to burn in hell or go to heaven, the clone duo decide to weigh his actions relative to the show and try to understand how he’ll be judged at the end of his life.

+ Episode Details

Topics Discussed

  • Morality
  • Lind the Engineer
  • Killing for Good
  • Judging Motivation
  • Utilitarianism
  • Pure Democracy
  • Weighing Right vs Wrong
  • The Infinite Judgement Loop
  • Naughty Dog Crunch Time

This episode of Just Conversation is brought to you by Audible. Get a free audiobook with a 30-day trial membership. Just go to https://audibletrial.com/justconvopod

Official Website - https://greythoughts.info/podcast

Twitter - https://twitter.com/JustConvoPod

Facebook - https://facebook.com/justconvopod

Instagram - https://instagram.com/justconvopod

JCP 4.04 Beyond Borders Podcast & Participation Trophies

Guest, Podcast, Race, Participation Trophy, The Just Conversation Podcast

Guest Kid Gravity of Beyond Borders Podcast joins us to discuss the corruption of 90s children, religious perspectives and agnosticism.

+ Episode Details

Remember to leave us a review on Apple Podcasts or anywhere you listen to podcasts to help us get noticed.We’ll read our favorites Apple Podcast reviews on the show! Tell friends, family or anyone you know who’ll like the show about it.

Topics Discussed- Agnosticism- Politics- Is Religion Important?- We’re All Faithful- Parents vs. Information- Censoring Art- Dragon Ball Anime- Adult Cartoons- Corrupted Youth- Eminem’s Social Commentary- Overprotecting Children- Crunch Time in Video Games- AAA Gaming

Kid Gravity on IG - https://instagram.com/bydorderskidgravitybeyond

Beyond Borders Podcast

On IG - https://instagram.com/bydordersbeyondborderspodcast

On IG - https://instagram.com/bydorders

Apple Podcasts - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/beyond-borders-with-rosegold-kid-gravity-we-speak-real/id1483805966

On Anchor FM - https://anchor.fm/beyondborders19

Our Links

Official Website - https://greythoughts.info/podcast

Twitter - https://twitter.com/JustConvoPod

Facebook - https://facebook.com/justconvopod

Instagram - https://instagram.com/justconvopod

Rambling 86: Coronavirus Conspiracy 2

Conspiracy, The Just Conversation Podcast, Podcasting, Virus, Pandemic, Vaccines,

Where did this virus come from? As the virus reaches it’s peak in many countries, the reason for its spread and the initial hording of toilet paper are debated and discussed.

Story:
Hiding out on Zombie Island Theme Park, the duo reads through their “borrowed” books from the Freemasons library and they unpack the possible origins for the coronavirus outbreak plaguing society.

+ Episode Details

Remember to leave us a review on Apple Podcasts or anywhere you listen to podcasts to help us get noticed.We’ll read our favorites Apple Podcast reviews on the show! Tell friends, family or anyone you know who’ll like the show about it.

Topics Discussed:

  • Faked Coronavirus
  • Forced Vaccines
  • Stripped of Rights
  • Bioterrorism
  • Putin’s New World Order
  • Overthrowing the Crown
  • Corporate Conspiracy
  • Toilet Paper Conspiracy
  • Plague From God
  • Magic Toilet Paper
  • Spiritual Toilet Paper
  • Bird Box
  • Toilet Paper Currency
  • Big Pharma Plot

Official Website - https://greythoughts.info/podcast

Twitter - https://twitter.com/JustConvoPod

Facebook - https://facebook.com/justconvopod

Instagram - https://instagram.com/justconvopod


Other Episodes

Rambling 82: Heavily Political Episode

Politics, Law, Government, Idea, Philosophy, Idiology, Republican, Democrat, Research, Learn, Teach, The Just Conversation Podcast

Do we understand politics? A breakdown of different political and socioeconomic systems and how they relate to the United States Government.

Story:
Dead center of chaotic times, a crazed pandemic worries the masses. As governments move to act quickly and contain the spread of the virus the clone duo set off on an investigation into political systems and how they could be used to improve the situation in the United States. But the truth uncovered about corrupt sensationalist news outlets could turn out to be darker than they could have ever imagined. All that and more on this episode of Just Conversation.

+ Episode Details

Remember to leave us a review on Apple Podcasts or anywhere you listen to podcasts to help us get noticed.We’ll read our favorites Apple Podcast reviews on the show! Tell friends, family or anyone you know who’ll like the show about it.

Topics Discussed

  • Fighting Books
  • Repeating History
  • Flaws with Democracy
  • Individual Freedoms
  • Democracy vs Democrat
  • Leftism vs Rightism
  • Republics
  • Fascism
  • Socialism
  • Capitalism
  • Communism
  • U.S. Government Structure
  • Sensationalism
  • Emotional Society

l

None of This is Real Podcast

(Promo at the Start of the show)

Find them on:

Apple Podcasts - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/none-of-this-is-real/id1439588586

Instagram - @noneofthisisrealpodcast

l

The Rob & Slim Show

(Promo at the End of the show)

Find them on:

Apple Podcasts - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-rob-and-slim-show/id992986831

Instagram - @robandslim

l

Official Website - https://greythoughts.info/podcast

Twitter - https://twitter.com/JustConvoPod

Facebook - https://facebook.com/justconvopod

Instagram - https://instagram.com/justconvopod

JCP 3.11 Rob and Slim Show & Escapism

The Rob and Slim Show, The Just Conversation Podcast, Guest, Podcast Guest, Society, Social Issues, Comedy, New World Order, Politics, Podcasting, Creating, Creativity

Guest Rob of The Rob and Slim Show joins Jack for a lengthy discussing ranging from the nature of their creativity, to their understanding of faith and religion and good parenting.

+ Episode Details

Remember to leave us a review on Apple Podcasts or anywhere you listen to podcasts to help us get noticed.We’ll read our favorites Apple Podcast reviews on the show! Tell friends, family or anyone you know who’ll like the show about it.

Topics Discussed:

  • Fake News and Politics
  • Work Ethic
  • Work Canvas
  • Singing The News
  • The Inner Artist
  • Quality Music
  • Eminem and Rap
  • Unapologetic Art
  • Crashing Ozzy’s Media Moment
  • Workaholics
  • ‘Too Many Rapes’ Origin Story
  • The College Trap
  • Collapsing System
  • Money Looks Evil
  • The Fear of Change
  • God, Prayer and Meditation
  • Parenting

Links for The Rob and Slim Show

Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/RobandSlimShow

IPM Nation: https://ipmnation.com/robandslim

Podbean: https://robandslim.podbean.com/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/robandslim/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Robandslimshow

Sporify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4wBeC4A5D1hexJKuKryg4H?si=5BGBhymlQXKJ1eDqbrWXiw


Our Links:

Twitter - https://twitter.com/JustConvoPod

Facebook - https://facebook.com/justconvopod

Instagram - https://instagram.com/justconvopod

Official Website - https://greythoughts.info/podcast

Rambling 67: Questions About Dreaming

Dreaming, Metaphysics, The Just Conversation Podcast, Theory, Conversation, Idea, Research, Science

Questions about dreaming, what it might be, what dreams might mean and how they related to Déjà vu and alternate realities sent by listeners are answered.

Story:
In a quest to understand the mind, subjective experience and the universe as a whole, the clone duo decide to investigate one of the more mysterious phenomenon known. Dreaming. They get listener submitted questions and do a deep dive into the topic, dissecting any and every possibility they come across. Alternate universes, time-lines, the afterlife, higher dimensions and more become possibilities as they investigate the depth of the human mind. All this and more on this episode of Just Conversation.

+ Episode Details:

Remember to leave us a review on Apple Podcasts or anywhere you listen to podcasts to help us get noticed.We’ll read our favorites Apple Podcast reviews on the show! Tell friends, family or anyone you know who’ll like the show about it.


Questions Asked:

  • Is Feeling Tired in Dreams Normal? @Lucid_nap 5:55
  • Could Dreams be a Second Life? @araig973 7:30
  • What are dreams? 11:25
  • Might dreams be future sight? 13:56
  • Is Deja Vu memory? 16:58
  • Why do we have recurring dreams? 18:28
  • Can a dream kill us? 22:26
  • Could ghosts haunt dreams? 26:27
  • Is it possible dreams are an alternate reality? 33:09
  • Could demons possess us while we dream? 37:10
  • Are we different people while dreaming? 39:47
  • Are Dreams Random? 43:14
  • Might dreams be based in an alternate location? 44:39
  • Is sleep talking related to dreaming? 47:50

This episode of Just Conversation is brought to you by Audible. Get a free audiobook with a 30-day trial membership. Just go to https://audibletrial.com/justconvopod

Twitter - https://twitter.com/JustConvoPod

Facebook - https://facebook.com/justconvopod

Instagram - https://instagram.com/justconvopod

Official Website - https://greythoughts.info/podcast

Rambling 65: Cybernetic Humans

Cyborg, Cybernetic Humans, Creatures, Science, Future Technology, Humans, Android, Apple, Playstation, Xbox, Computing, Elon Musk, Google, Facebook, Tesla, Robotics

Future technology, the increasingly cybernetic nature of humans and the philosophy of perspectivism are discussed.

Story:
With technological advancements moving at ever increasing speeds, the clone duo decide to figure out what the road ahead for technology might be and how it will shape human civilization moving forward with hopes that this knowledge will give them insight into Elon Musk’s plans for the future.

Remember to leave us a review on Apple Podcasts or anywhere you listen to podcasts to help us get noticed.We’ll read our favorites Apple Podcast reviews on the show! Tell friends, family or anyone you know who’ll like the show about it.

+ Episode Details

Topics Discussed- The Power of Perspective- Telepathic Communication- Elon Musk’s Tech- Mind Control Technology- Augmented Reality- AR Eye Implants- AR Downloadable World Skins & Themes- AR Google Maps Directions- VR in the Future- VR Theatre- VR & AR Dating- AR Relationships- VR Sex Suits- Competitive Technology Market- Cyborg Humans- Avatar Robots- A.I. Equality- Virtual Brainwashing

This episode of Just Conversation is brought to you by Audible. Get a free audiobook with a 30-day trial membership. Just go to https://audibletrial.com/justconvopod

Twitter - https://twitter.com/JustConvoPod

Facebook - https://facebook.com/justconvopod

Instagram - https://instagram.com/justconvopod

Official Website - https://greythoughts.info/podcast

Rambling 64: Questions About Death

Death, The Afterlife, Metaphysics, The Just Conversation Podcast, spooky, Creepy, Scary, Horror, String Theory, Heaven, Hell, Reincarnation, Faith, Satan, God, Love, Hate

Questions on death, its nature and the philosophical implications sent by listeners are answered.

Story:
Curious about the philosophical nature of death, the clones crack open the case and pick apart listener questions about death and the nature of life. In answering the questions they answer the burning question of whether or not God is alive and serious implications arise. All that and more on this episode of Just Conversation!

Remember to leave us a review on Apple Podcasts or anywhere you listen to podcasts to help us get noticed.We’ll read our favorites Apple Podcast reviews on the show! Tell friends, family or anyone you know who’ll like the show about it.

+ Episode Details

Questions Asked:

  • 04:12 - Is God Dead?
  • 12:43 - Can Death Be Possible?
  • 20:45 - Might This Be An Illusion?
  • 24:46 - What Would Death Feel Like?
  • 29:37 - Do You Believe in Immortality?
  • 31:48 - Could We Die In Higher Dimensions?
  • 34:40 - Are There Different Types of Death?
  • 38:10 - Philosophically Speaking, What is Death?
  • 39:15 - Believe In Life After Death?
  • 42:04 - Anything Worth Dying For?
  • 43:40 - Would You Like To Know When You Die?
  • 46:51 - What If No One Ever Died?
  • 50:41 - Last Meal On Death Row?
  • 51:22 - Lightning Round

This episode of Just Conversation is brought to you by Audible. Get a free audiobook with a 30-day trial membership. Just go to https://audibletrial.com/justconvopod

Twitter - https://twitter.com/JustConvoPod

Facebook - https://facebook.com/justconvopod

Instagram - https://instagram.com/justconvopod

Official Website - https://greythoughts.info/podcast