How many adjustable spanners are there in the world?
Meaningful interaction with this question
involves and requires
recognition of the latent emergency
of the essentializing informational inquiry imperative nominally situated
at the apex of a hyper inquisitive meta suite
of investigative strategies that negate formulaic contingencies
in superlative categorical hierarchical arrangements of theoretical completeness
excepting as unique essential banal retort
for the treatment of classifying interrogative positioning and articulation
within the boundaries of structural dimensional sequence identification
in the iterative.
Now;
The emergence of multi disciplinary approaches
at the original context of multivalent uncertainties generates -
through the interpolation of notions of ''correctness''
with concepts of post existential apriori knowingness -
logistical formulations of numerical assessment which accordingly ''erupt'' into being
through deployment of traditional and so inevitably questionable responses and resources
e.g. ''counting'';
hence the knowable is in a state of becoming notwithstanding any specificity
of paradigmatic instabilities
so tasking the context/territory of notional quantification
with inevitable situational integrating formality.
Thus; the adjustable spanner assumes numinous and heterogenous finality in it's finite being.
or to put it another way and in other words
there is more than one adjustable spanner in the world
that is to say
at least two
and if you actually count them
using numbers in their proper order and one after the other
e.g. 1 - 2 etc
and thereby
adhering to the immutable principles of pure logic
you will know exactly how many
adjustable spanners
there are in the world now
at the time being and
exactly.

By Anthony Andrea